An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that, under the Lanham Act, a claim of trademark dilution requires proof of actual dilution. This decision was later superseded by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (TDRA).

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that, under the Lanham Act, a claim of trademark dilution requires proof of actual dilution. This decision was later superseded by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (TDRA). (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 38042129 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 10320 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1116547086 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-12 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2002 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Kennedy (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-03-04 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2003 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Victor Moseley and Cathy Moseley, dba Victor's Little Secret, v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., et al. (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • A claim of trademark dilution requires evidence of actual dilution, not merely a likelihood of dilution (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • Federal Trademark Dilution Act, 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125, 1127 (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 17280.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:subsequent
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 418 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 537 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that, under the Lanham Act, a claim of trademark dilution requires proof of actual dilution. This decision was later superseded by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (TDRA). (en)
rdfs:label
  • Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Victor Moseley and Cathy Moseley, dba Victor's Little Secret, v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License