dbo:abstract
|
- Miglin v Miglin, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 303, 2003 SCC 24, is the leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the use of separation agreements. The Court established a two-stage test to determine whether a separation agreement can be relied upon. Prior to the Miglin decision, the leading cases on separation agreements was the . In those cases, it was held that a separation agreement is binding and a party can only apply for spousal support where there has been a radical and unforeseeable change in circumstances which has a causal connection to the marriage. The Miglin decision rejected this strict test. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 4070 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:caseName
| |
dbp:citations
|
- [2003] 1 S.C.R. 303, 2003 SCC 24 (en)
|
dbp:decidedDate
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:fullCaseName
|
- Eric Juri Miglin v Linda Susan Miglin (en)
|
dbp:heardDate
| |
dbp:joindissent
| |
dbp:joinmajority
|
- McLachlin C.J. and Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, and Binnie JJ. (en)
|
dbp:majority
|
- Bastarache and Arbour JJ. (en)
|
dbp:ruling
| |
dbp:scc
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Miglin v Miglin, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 303, 2003 SCC 24, is the leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the use of separation agreements. The Court established a two-stage test to determine whether a separation agreement can be relied upon. (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |