An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

In the case of Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform [2010] IESC 3; [2010] 2 IR 701; [2011] 2 ILRM 157, the Supreme Court of Ireland found that the proportionality test should be used when reviewing administrative actions that implicate fundamental rights protected by both the Irish Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. While the case concerned an application for judicial review of an asylum decision, the decision was described as carrying “implications for the whole body of Irish administrative law”.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • In the case of Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform [2010] IESC 3; [2010] 2 IR 701; [2011] 2 ILRM 157, the Supreme Court of Ireland found that the proportionality test should be used when reviewing administrative actions that implicate fundamental rights protected by both the Irish Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. While the case concerned an application for judicial review of an asylum decision, the decision was described as carrying “implications for the whole body of Irish administrative law”. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 60300054 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 7883 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1082198185 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:appealedFrom
  • 0001-11-04 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:caption
dbp:citations
  • [2010] IESC 3; [2010] 2 IR 701; [2011] 2 ILRM 157 (en)
dbp:concurring
  • Fennelly J, Denham J, and Murray CJ (en)
dbp:court
dbp:dateDecided
  • 2010-01-21 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy
  • Murray CJ (en)
dbp:dissenting
  • Hardiman J and Kearns P (en)
dbp:fullName
  • Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform (en)
dbp:italicTitle
  • yes (en)
dbp:judges
  • Murray CJ, Kearns P, Denham J, Hardiman J, Fennelly J. (en)
dbp:keywords
dbp:name
  • Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform (en)
dbp:numberOfJudges
  • 5 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdfs:comment
  • In the case of Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform [2010] IESC 3; [2010] 2 IR 701; [2011] 2 ILRM 157, the Supreme Court of Ireland found that the proportionality test should be used when reviewing administrative actions that implicate fundamental rights protected by both the Irish Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. While the case concerned an application for judicial review of an asylum decision, the decision was described as carrying “implications for the whole body of Irish administrative law”. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Meadows v. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License