| dbo:abstract
|
- Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a federal district court had equal or concurrent jurisdiction with state probate (will) courts over tort claims under state common law. The case drew an unusual amount of interest because the petitioner was Playboy Playmate and celebrity Anna Nicole Smith (whose legal name was Vickie Lynn Marshall). Smith won the case, but unsolved issues regarding her inheritance eventually led to another Supreme Court case, Stern v. Marshall. She died long before that case was decided. (en)
- Marshall vs. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), é um caso em que a Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos decidiu que um tribunal distrital federal tinha igual ou com os tribunais estaduais sobre atos ilícitos envolvendo reivindicações de acordo com o estado de direito comum. O caso atraiu uma quantidade incomum de interesse, porque a requerente foi Playmate da Playboy e celebridade Anna Nicole Smith (cujo nome real era Vickie Lynn Marshall). Smith ganhou o caso, mas sem solução de problemas a respeito de sua herança, eventualmente, levou a outra o caso do Suprema Corte, Stern vs. Marshall. Ela morreu muito antes do caso ser decidido. (pt)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 12601 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-02-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Marshall v. Marshall, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-05-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Vickie Lynn Marshall v. E. Pierce Marshall (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- Jurisdiction was properly asserted by a Federal District Court over a widow debtor's counterclaim for tortious interference with a gift, because the judicially crafted "probate exception" to Federal court jurisdiction did not apply. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded. (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer, Alito (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Marshall v. Marshall (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:subsequent
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a federal district court had equal or concurrent jurisdiction with state probate (will) courts over tort claims under state common law. The case drew an unusual amount of interest because the petitioner was Playboy Playmate and celebrity Anna Nicole Smith (whose legal name was Vickie Lynn Marshall). Smith won the case, but unsolved issues regarding her inheritance eventually led to another Supreme Court case, Stern v. Marshall. She died long before that case was decided. (en)
- Marshall vs. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), é um caso em que a Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos decidiu que um tribunal distrital federal tinha igual ou com os tribunais estaduais sobre atos ilícitos envolvendo reivindicações de acordo com o estado de direito comum. O caso atraiu uma quantidade incomum de interesse, porque a requerente foi Playmate da Playboy e celebridade Anna Nicole Smith (cujo nome real era Vickie Lynn Marshall). Smith ganhou o caso, mas sem solução de problemas a respeito de sua herança, eventualmente, levou a outra o caso do Suprema Corte, Stern vs. Marshall. Ela morreu muito antes do caso ser decidido. (pt)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Marshall v. Marshall (en)
- Caso Marshall v. Marshall (pt)
|
| rdfs:seeAlso
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:homepage
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Vickie Lynn Marshall v. E. Pierce Marshall (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is rdfs:seeAlso
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
