An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Manchester Airport plc v Dutton [1999] EWCA 844 is an English land law case, concerning licences in land. It confirmed the court will attach to licences, even where narrowly drawn to avoid giving away title, a right to occupy provided it meets with the clear commercial purposes of the contract. This means those third parties, in this case protestors, who interfered with such rights must be removed.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Manchester Airport plc v Dutton [1999] EWCA 844 is an English land law case, concerning licences in land. It confirmed the court will attach to licences, even where narrowly drawn to avoid giving away title, a right to occupy provided it meets with the clear commercial purposes of the contract. This means those third parties, in this case protestors, who interfered with such rights must be removed. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 35736967 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 4685 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1092153795 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:citations
  • [1999] EWCA Civ 844, [2000] QB 133 (en)
dbp:concurring
dbp:court
dbp:dissenting
  • Chadwick LJ (en)
dbp:judges
dbp:keywords
  • Licence; right of licensee to occupy; building works; Trust technically prohibited from alienating title; environmental protesters (en)
dbp:name
  • Manchester Airport plc v Dutton (en)
dbp:opinions
  • Held, per Laws LJ: The court uses the contract to determine the control that arises from the contract. It then couples that with the right of occupation and then proceeds to grant relief as would vindicate licensee's rights of occupation arising out of the contract. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Manchester Airport plc v Dutton [1999] EWCA 844 is an English land law case, concerning licences in land. It confirmed the court will attach to licences, even where narrowly drawn to avoid giving away title, a right to occupy provided it meets with the clear commercial purposes of the contract. This means those third parties, in this case protestors, who interfered with such rights must be removed. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Manchester Airport plc v Dutton (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License