About: Lux v. Haggin

An Entity of Type: Abstraction100002137, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (1886), is a historic case in the conflict between riparian and appropriative water rights. Decided by a vote of four to three in the Supreme Court of California, the ruling held that appropriative rights were secondary to riparian rights.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (1886), is a historic case in the conflict between riparian and appropriative water rights. Decided by a vote of four to three in the Supreme Court of California, the ruling held that appropriative rights were secondary to riparian rights. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID	35204151 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	9897 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1053598161 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Robert_F._Morrison dbc:United_States_water_case_law dbr:Elisha_W._McKinstry dbc:1886_in_United_States_case_law dbc:History_of_Kern_County,_California dbr:Common_law dbc:1886_in_California dbc:California_state_case_law dbc:Water_in_California dbr:James_Ben_Ali_Haggin dbr:Kern_River dbr:Appropriative_water_rights dbr:Buena_Vista_Slough dbc:Kern_River dbr:Riparian_water_rights dbr:Kern_County dbr:Erskine_M._Ross
dbp:associatejudges	Elisha W. McKinstry, Samuel B. McKee, John R. Sharpstein, James D. Thornton, Erskine M. Ross, Milton H. Myrick (en)
dbp:chiefjudge	dbr:Robert_F._Morrison
dbp:citations	; 10 P. 674 (en)
dbp:concurrence	McKee, Sharpstein, Thornton (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-04-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1886 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Ross (en) Myrick (en)
dbp:fullname	Charles Lux et al., Appellants, v. James B. Haggin et al. The Kern River Land and Canal Company, Respondent (en)
dbp:holding	Riparian water rights are superior to appropriative water rights. Appropriation of water for public use is permitted with just compensation. (en)
dbp:joindissent	Morrison (en)
dbp:litigants	Lux v. Haggin (en)
dbp:majority	McKinstry (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Law_report dbt:Infobox_California_Supreme_Court_case
dct:subject	dbc:United_States_water_case_law dbc:1886_in_United_States_case_law dbc:History_of_Kern_County,_California dbc:1886_in_California dbc:California_state_case_law dbc:Water_in_California dbc:Kern_River
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:comment	Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (1886), is a historic case in the conflict between riparian and appropriative water rights. Decided by a vote of four to three in the Supreme Court of California, the ruling held that appropriative rights were secondary to riparian rights. (en)
rdfs:label	Lux v. Haggin (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Lux v. Haggin wikidata:Lux v. Haggin https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4qo91
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Lux_v._Haggin?oldid=1053598161&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Lux_v._Haggin
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Charles_Lux dbr:Elisha_W._McKinstry dbr:Central_Valley_Project dbr:Water_in_California dbr:Kern_River dbr:Buena_Vista_Slough dbr:Water_Commission_Act_of_1913
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Lux_v._Haggin