dbo:abstract
|
- Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court decision regarding school prayer. It was the first major school prayer case decided by the Rehnquist Court. It held that schools may not sponsor clerics to conduct even non-denominational prayer. The Court followed a broad interpretation of the Establishment Clause that had been standard for decades at the nation's highest court, a reaffirmation of the principles of such landmark cases as Engel v. Vitale and Abington v. Schempp. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 19247 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
| |
dbp:concurrence
|
- Souter (en)
- Blackmun (en)
|
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:findlaw
| |
dbp:first
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Robert E. Lee, Individually and as Principal of Nathan Bishop Middle School, et al., Petitioners v. Daniel Weisman etc. (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- Including a clergy-led prayer within the events of a public high school graduation violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. (en)
|
dbp:joinconcurrence
| |
dbp:joindissent
|
- Rehnquist, White, Thomas (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Souter (en)
|
dbp:journal
|
- Case W. Res. L. Rev. (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:last
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
| |
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:page
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:title
| |
dbp:url
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:volume
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dbp:year
| |
dct:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court decision regarding school prayer. It was the first major school prayer case decided by the Rehnquist Court. It held that schools may not sponsor clerics to conduct even non-denominational prayer. The Court followed a broad interpretation of the Establishment Clause that had been standard for decades at the nation's highest court, a reaffirmation of the principles of such landmark cases as Engel v. Vitale and Abington v. Schempp. (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Robert E. Lee, Individually and as Principal of Nathan Bishop Middle School, et al., Petitioners v. Daniel Weisman etc. (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |