About: Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.

An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc., 152 Wash.2d 828 (2004), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington that invalidated a modification of an employment contract for an at-will employee which would have added a non-competition agreement because the modification lacked independent consideration. Anthony A. Labriola worked as a salesperson for the Pollard Group, a commercial print shop in Tacoma, Washington. The case serves as an example of when courts will strictly invoke the pre-existing duty rule in the interests of justice, in this case to protect an at-will employee.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc., 152 Wash.2d 828 (2004), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington that invalidated a modification of an employment contract for an at-will employee which would have added a non-competition agreement because the modification lacked independent consideration. Anthony A. Labriola worked as a salesperson for the Pollard Group, a commercial print shop in Tacoma, Washington. The case serves as an example of when courts will strictly invoke the pre-existing duty rule in the interests of justice, in this case to protect an at-will employee. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/wa-supreme-court/1090272.html
dbo:wikiPageID	25710828 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	1386 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	847807401 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Pre-existing_duty_rule dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbr:Consideration dbc:Washington_(state)_state_case_law dbc:Printing_in_the_United_States dbc:Economy_of_Tacoma,_Washington dbc:United_States_contract_case_law dbc:2004_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Legal_case dbr:Non-compete_clause dbr:Printer_(publishing) dbc:2004_in_Washington_(state) dbc:Law_articles_needing_an_infobox dbr:Tacoma,_Washington dbr:Case_citation dbr:At-will_employee dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Washington
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbc:Washington_(state)_state_case_law dbc:Printing_in_the_United_States dbc:Economy_of_Tacoma,_Washington dbc:United_States_contract_case_law dbc:2004_in_United_States_case_law dbc:2004_in_Washington_(state) dbc:Law_articles_needing_an_infobox
rdfs:comment	Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc., 152 Wash.2d 828 (2004), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Washington that invalidated a modification of an employment contract for an at-will employee which would have added a non-competition agreement because the modification lacked independent consideration. Anthony A. Labriola worked as a salesperson for the Pollard Group, a commercial print shop in Tacoma, Washington. The case serves as an example of when courts will strictly invoke the pre-existing duty rule in the interests of justice, in this case to protect an at-will employee. (en)
rdfs:label	Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc. wikidata:Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4pnRj
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Labriola_v._Pollard_Group,_Inc.?oldid=847807401&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Labriola_v._Pollard_Group,_Inc.
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:152_Wash.2d_828
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Pre-existing_duty_rule dbr:Non-compete_clause dbr:152_Wash.2d_828
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Labriola_v._Pollard_Group,_Inc.