About: Kienapple v R

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Kienapple v R, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that established the rule against multiple convictions known as the Kienapple principle. Justice Bora Laskin, for the court, held that an accused cannot be convicted of two offences where they both arise out of substantially the same facts. John Edward Kienapple was charged with rape and unlawful sexual intercourse with a female under 14 years of age. At trial he was convicted on both charges. On appeal to the Supreme Court his conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse was overturned.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Kienapple v R, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that established the rule against multiple convictions known as the Kienapple principle. Justice Bora Laskin, for the court, held that an accused cannot be convicted of two offences where they both arise out of substantially the same facts. John Edward Kienapple was charged with rape and unlawful sexual intercourse with a female under 14 years of age. At trial he was convicted on both charges. On appeal to the Supreme Court his conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse was overturned. (en)
  • Kienapple c. R. est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada rendu en 1975 qui a établi la règle interdisant les condamnations multiples connue sous le nom de principe de Kienapple. Le juge Bora Laskin, au nom de la Cour, a conclu qu'un accusé ne peut être déclaré coupable de deux infractions lorsqu'elles découlent toutes deux essentiellement des mêmes faits. John Edward Kienapple a été inculpé de viol et de relations sexuelles illégales avec une femme de moins de 14 ans. Au procès, il a été reconnu coupable des deux chefs d'accusation. En appel devant la Cour suprême, sa condamnation pour rapports sexuels illégaux fut annulée. (fr)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 5137430 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 1682 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1116561947 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • Kienapple v R (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 1974 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Ritchie (en)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • John Edward Kienapple v Her Majesty the Queen (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Fauteux, Abbott, and Martland (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Judson, Spence, Pigeon, and Dickson (en)
dbp:majority
  • Laskin (en)
dbp:scc
  • 1970 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Kienapple v R, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that established the rule against multiple convictions known as the Kienapple principle. Justice Bora Laskin, for the court, held that an accused cannot be convicted of two offences where they both arise out of substantially the same facts. John Edward Kienapple was charged with rape and unlawful sexual intercourse with a female under 14 years of age. At trial he was convicted on both charges. On appeal to the Supreme Court his conviction for unlawful sexual intercourse was overturned. (en)
  • Kienapple c. R. est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada rendu en 1975 qui a établi la règle interdisant les condamnations multiples connue sous le nom de principe de Kienapple. Le juge Bora Laskin, au nom de la Cour, a conclu qu'un accusé ne peut être déclaré coupable de deux infractions lorsqu'elles découlent toutes deux essentiellement des mêmes faits. (fr)
rdfs:label
  • Kienapple c. R. (fr)
  • Kienapple v R (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License