About: Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros.

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros., 222 U.S. 55 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held producing a motion picture based on a dramatic work can be copyright infringement. The producer of the motion picture is liable even they are not the exhibitor. This does not extend to a restriction of the dramatic work's ideas; it is a recognition of the author's monopoly powers granted by Congress. The case involved a 1907 film adaptation of the 1880 novel Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ by Lew Wallace.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros., 222 U.S. 55 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held producing a motion picture based on a dramatic work can be copyright infringement. The producer of the motion picture is liable even they are not the exhibitor. This does not extend to a restriction of the dramatic work's ideas; it is a recognition of the author's monopoly powers granted by Congress. The case involved a 1907 film adaptation of the 1880 novel Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ by Lew Wallace. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/222/55.html https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/222/55/case.html https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/97466/kalem-co-v-harper-brothers/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/222/55 http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep222/usrep222055/usrep222055.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	58183138 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	6708 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1083180075 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbc:1911_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Ben-Hur:_A_Tale_of_the_Christ dbr:Ben-Hur_(play) dbr:Ben_Hur_(1907_film) dbr:Union_(American_Civil_War) dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Cinema_of_the_United_States dbr:Emile_Henry_Lacombe dbr:Lew_Wallace dbr:Library_of_Congress dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbr:Kalem_Company dbr:Harper_(publisher) dbr:Henry_Galbraith_Ward dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_White_Court dbr:L._Ed. dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr. dbr:Klaw_and_Erlanger dbr:Motion_Picture_Patents_Company dbr:Uncle_Tom's_Cabin
dbp:arguedatea	0001-10-31 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:arguedateb	0001-11-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1911 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros., (en)
dbp:cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/222/55
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/97466/kalem-co-v-harper-brothers/
dbp:decidedate	0001-11-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1911 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/222/55.html
dbp:fullname	Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros. (en)
dbp:holding	Producing a motion picture based on a dramatic work can be copyright infringement. The producer of the motion picture is liable even they are not the exhibitor. This does not extend to a restriction of the dramatic work's ideas; it is a recognition of the author's monopoly powers granted by Congress. (en)
dbp:joinmajority	unanimous (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/222/55/case.html
dbp:litigants	Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros. (en)
dbp:loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep222/usrep222055/usrep222055.pdf
dbp:majority	Holmes Jr. (en)
dbp:parallelcitations	32 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage	55 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	222 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Inflation dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:SCOTUS-stub dbt:USArticleI
dcterms:subject	dbc:1911_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_White_Court
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros., 222 U.S. 55 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held producing a motion picture based on a dramatic work can be copyright infringement. The producer of the motion picture is liable even they are not the exhibitor. This does not extend to a restriction of the dramatic work's ideas; it is a recognition of the author's monopoly powers granted by Congress. The case involved a 1907 film adaptation of the 1880 novel Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ by Lew Wallace. (en)
rdfs:label	Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros. (en)
owl:sameAs	wikidata:Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/8BgTm
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Kalem_Co._v._Harper_Bros.?oldid=1083180075&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Kalem_Co._v._Harper_Bros.
foaf:name	(en) Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Kalem_Co._v_Harper_Bros. dbr:222_U.S._55
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_copyright_case_law dbr:Ben-Hur:_A_Tale_of_the_Christ dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_222 dbr:Kalem_Co._v_Harper_Bros. dbr:222_U.S._55 dbr:Kalem_Company
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Kalem_Co._v._Harper_Bros.