An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Jimenez v. Quarterman, 555 U.S. 113 (2009), was a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A), the conviction of a state defendant is not "final" if a state court grants an "out-of-time" appeal and the defendant has not yet filed a federal habeas petition.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Jimenez v. Quarterman, 555 U.S. 113 (2009), was a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A), the conviction of a state defendant is not "final" if a state court grants an "out-of-time" appeal and the defendant has not yet filed a federal habeas petition. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 23439713 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 4749 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 930313840 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-04 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2008 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Jimenez v. Quarterman, 555 U.S. 113 (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-01-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2009 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 7 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Jimenez v. Quarterman (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • A state conviction is not "final" for the purpose of filing a federal habeas petition when a state court grants an out-of-time appeal. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • unanimous (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • , Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Jimenez v. Quarterman (en)
dbp:majority
  • Thomas (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • No. 06-11240 ; cert. granted, . (en)
dbp:subsequent
  • On remand, Jimenez v. Thaler, 367 F. App'x 489 . (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 113 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 555 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Jimenez v. Quarterman, 555 U.S. 113 (2009), was a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A), the conviction of a state defendant is not "final" if a state court grants an "out-of-time" appeal and the defendant has not yet filed a federal habeas petition. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Jimenez v. Quarterman (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Jimenez v. Quarterman (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License