An Entity of Type: Abstraction100002137, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 893 F. Supp. 2d 1058 (D. Nev. 2012), was a United States District Court for the District of Nevada case in which the Court held that Zappos.com's customers were not held to the browsewrap terms of use because of their obscure nature. The courts also held that the agreement was unenforceable because Zappos had reserved the right to change it at any time without informing the customers.This court decision set a precedent for businesses that use browsewrap agreements and/or include a clause in their agreements that allow them to change the agreements at any time.The decision encouraged conversation on how a business should most fairly display its terms of use and how to avoid unfairness and ambiguity when writing them.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 893 F. Supp. 2d 1058 (D. Nev. 2012), was a United States District Court for the District of Nevada case in which the Court held that Zappos.com's customers were not held to the browsewrap terms of use because of their obscure nature. The courts also held that the agreement was unenforceable because Zappos had reserved the right to change it at any time without informing the customers.This court decision set a precedent for businesses that use browsewrap agreements and/or include a clause in their agreements that allow them to change the agreements at any time.The decision encouraged conversation on how a business should most fairly display its terms of use and how to avoid unfairness and ambiguity when writing them. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 40683302 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 15276 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1067513239 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:case
  • In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation (en)
dbp:citations
  • 172800.0
dbp:court
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:dateDecided
  • 2012-09-27 (xsd:date)
dbp:defendant
  • Amazon.com, Inc., dba Zappos.com (en)
dbp:docket
  • 3 (xsd:integer)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Customers did not agree to Zappos.com's browsewrap terms of use; arbitration clause is unenforceable (en)
dbp:imagesize
  • 150 (xsd:integer)
dbp:judge
dbp:justia
dbp:keywords
dbp:leagle
dbp:name
  • In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • RECAP Archive (en)
  • Santa Clara Law Digital Commons (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:prosecutor
  • Stacy Penson, Stephanie Priera, Robert Ree, Josh Richards, Christa Seal, Shari Simon, Mrs. Sylvia St. Lawrence, Theresa D. Stevens, Kathryn Vorhoff, Brooke C. Brown, Tara J. Elliott and Ms. Dahlia Habashy (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 893 F. Supp. 2d 1058 (D. Nev. 2012), was a United States District Court for the District of Nevada case in which the Court held that Zappos.com's customers were not held to the browsewrap terms of use because of their obscure nature. The courts also held that the agreement was unenforceable because Zappos had reserved the right to change it at any time without informing the customers.This court decision set a precedent for businesses that use browsewrap agreements and/or include a clause in their agreements that allow them to change the agreements at any time.The decision encouraged conversation on how a business should most fairly display its terms of use and how to avoid unfairness and ambiguity when writing them. (en)
rdfs:label
  • In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License