An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. The Court ruled unanimously that there is not a presumption of market power under the Sherman Antitrust Act when the sale of a patented product is conditioned on the sale of a second product in a tying arrangement. A plaintiff alleging an antitrust violation must instead establish the defendant's market power in the patented product through evidence.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. The Court ruled unanimously that there is not a presumption of market power under the Sherman Antitrust Act when the sale of a patented product is conditioned on the sale of a second product in a tying arrangement. A plaintiff alleging an antitrust violation must instead establish the defendant's market power in the patented product through evidence. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 4545589 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 5502 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 910107595 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-11-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2005 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-03-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 4 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Illinois Tool Works Incorporated, et al. v. Independent Ink, Incorporated (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • A product involved in a tying arrangement is not presumed to have market power for purposes of establishing an antitrust violation by the mere fact that it is patented. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • 15 (xsd:integer)
dbp:litigants
  • Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (en)
dbp:majority
  • Stevens (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 17280.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:subsequent
  • On remand at Indep. Ink, Inc. v. Ill. Tool Works, Inc., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10770 (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 28 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 547 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. The Court ruled unanimously that there is not a presumption of market power under the Sherman Antitrust Act when the sale of a patented product is conditioned on the sale of a second product in a tying arrangement. A plaintiff alleging an antitrust violation must instead establish the defendant's market power in the patented product through evidence. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Illinois Tool Works Incorporated, et al. v. Independent Ink, Incorporated (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License