About: Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. The Court ruled unanimously that there is not a presumption of market power under the Sherman Antitrust Act when the sale of a patented product is conditioned on the sale of a second product in a tying arrangement. A plaintiff alleging an antitrust violation must instead establish the defendant's market power in the patented product through evidence.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. The Court ruled unanimously that there is not a presumption of market power under the Sherman Antitrust Act when the sale of a patented product is conditioned on the sale of a second product in a tying arrangement. A plaintiff alleging an antitrust violation must instead establish the defendant's market power in the patented product through evidence. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/396/1342/592564/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-1329.pdf https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12062423076831474839 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/547/28/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145673/illinois-tool-works-inc-v-independent-ink-inc/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/20021365210fsupp2d115511246
dbo:wikiPageID	4545589 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	5502 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	910107595 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:End_user dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Central_District_of_California dbr:Ink_cartridge dbr:Manufacture dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Bloomberg_BNA dbr:Federal_Reporter dbr:Patent dbr:Market_power dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbc:Computer_printing dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Federal_Supplement dbc:United_States_patent_case_law dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Certiorari dbr:Sherman_Antitrust_Act dbr:Tying_(commerce) dbr:United_States_Code dbr:Summary_judgment dbr:U.S._App._LEXIS dbr:Antitrust dbr:Bar_code dbr:Printer_ink dbr:U.S.P.Q.2d dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-11-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2005 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., (en)
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145673/illinois-tool-works-inc-v-independent-ink-inc/
dbp:decidedate	0001-03-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket	4 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Illinois Tool Works Incorporated, et al. v. Independent Ink, Incorporated (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12062423076831474839
dbp:holding	A product involved in a tying arrangement is not presumed to have market power for purposes of establishing an antitrust violation by the mere fact that it is patented. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded. (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/547/28/
dbp:lawsapplied	15 (xsd:integer)
dbp:litigants	Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (en)
dbp:majority	Stevens (en)
dbp:notparticipating	Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-1329.pdf
dbp:parallelcitations	17280.0
dbp:prior	25920.0
dbp:subsequent	On remand at Indep. Ink, Inc. v. Ill. Tool Works, Inc., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10770 (en)
dbp:uspage	28 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	547 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbc:Computer_printing dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_patent_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:comment	Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. The Court ruled unanimously that there is not a presumption of market power under the Sherman Antitrust Act when the sale of a patented product is conditioned on the sale of a second product in a tying arrangement. A plaintiff alleging an antitrust violation must instead establish the defendant's market power in the patented product through evidence. (en)
rdfs:label	Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. yago-res:Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. wikidata:Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4nHkd
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Illinois_Tool_Works_Inc._v._Independent_Ink,_Inc.?oldid=910107595&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Illinois_Tool_Works_Inc._v._Independent_Ink,_Inc.
foaf:name	(en) Illinois Tool Works Incorporated, et al. v. Independent Ink, Incorporated (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:547_U.S._28 dbr:Illinois_Tool_Works,_Inc._v._Independent_Ink,_Inc dbr:Illinois_Tool_Works,_Inc._v._Independent_Ink,_Inc. dbr:Illinois_Tool_Works_Inc._v_Independent_Ink,_Inc. dbr:Ill._Tool_Works_Inc._v._Indep._Ink,_Inc. dbr:Illinois_Tool_Works_v._Independent_Ink
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Princo_Corp._v._ITC dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_patent_case_law dbr:List_of_United_States_patent_law_cases dbr:United_States_antitrust_law dbr:List_of_patent_case_law dbr:547_U.S._28 dbr:History_of_software dbr:Illinois_Tool_Works,_Inc._v._Independent_Ink,_Inc dbr:Illinois_Tool_Works,_Inc._v._Independent_Ink,_Inc. dbr:Illinois_Tool_Works_Inc._v_Independent_Ink,_Inc. dbr:Ill._Tool_Works_Inc._v._Indep._Ink,_Inc. dbr:Illinois_Tool_Works_v._Independent_Ink
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Illinois_Tool_Works_Inc._v._Independent_Ink,_Inc.