dbo:abstract
|
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. The Court ruled unanimously that there is not a presumption of market power under the Sherman Antitrust Act when the sale of a patented product is conditioned on the sale of a second product in a tying arrangement. A plaintiff alleging an antitrust violation must instead establish the defendant's market power in the patented product through evidence. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 5502 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., (en)
|
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-03-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Illinois Tool Works Incorporated, et al. v. Independent Ink, Incorporated (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- A product involved in a tying arrangement is not presumed to have market power for purposes of establishing an antitrust violation by the mere fact that it is patented. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded. (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:notparticipating
| |
dbp:otherSource
| |
dbp:otherUrl
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:subsequent
|
- On remand at Indep. Ink, Inc. v. Ill. Tool Works, Inc., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10770 (en)
|
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. The Court ruled unanimously that there is not a presumption of market power under the Sherman Antitrust Act when the sale of a patented product is conditioned on the sale of a second product in a tying arrangement. A plaintiff alleging an antitrust violation must instead establish the defendant's market power in the patented product through evidence. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Illinois Tool Works Incorporated, et al. v. Independent Ink, Incorporated (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |