About: Hurn v. Oursler

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U.S. 238 (1933), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held A significant federal question raised by a suit can give jurisdiction to federal courts. If the federal question is rejected on the merits, the federal court still has jurisdiction to decide the local question on the merits. The case being discussed was a copyright infringement suit.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U.S. 238 (1933), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held A significant federal question raised by a suit can give jurisdiction to federal courts. If the federal question is rejected on the merits, the federal court still has jurisdiction to decide the local question on the merits. The case being discussed was a copyright infringement suit. In United States v. United States Gypsum Co., the Court's majority opinion referred to Hurn v. Oursler in passing. Justice Felix Frankfurter expanded this and recounted the case's background in his concurrence as a key point in his argument. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 57844651 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2441 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 986694244 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-02-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1933 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Hurn v. Oursler, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Brandeis (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-04-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1933 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Hurn v. Oursler (en)
dbp:holding
  • A significant federal question raised by a suit can give jurisdiction to federal courts. If the federal question is rejected on the merits, the federal court still has jurisdiction to decide the local question on the merits. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Stone (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Hughes, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Butler, Roberts, Cardozo (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Hurn v. Oursler (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Sutherland (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 53 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 238 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 289 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U.S. 238 (1933), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held A significant federal question raised by a suit can give jurisdiction to federal courts. If the federal question is rejected on the merits, the federal court still has jurisdiction to decide the local question on the merits. The case being discussed was a copyright infringement suit. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Hurn v. Oursler (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Hurn v. Oursler (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License