About: House v. Bell

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case challenging the permissibility of new DNA forensic evidence that becomes available post-conviction, in capital punishment appeals when those claims have defaulted pursuant to state law. The Court found that admitting new DNA evidence was in line with Schlup v. Delo (1995), which allows cases to be reopened in light of new evidence.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case challenging the permissibility of new DNA forensic evidence that becomes available post-conviction, in capital punishment appeals when those claims have defaulted pursuant to state law. The Court found that admitting new DNA evidence was in line with Schlup v. Delo (1995), which allows cases to be reopened in light of new evidence. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-8990.ZS.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/04-8990 http://malefactorsregister.com/wp/%3Fp=1915 https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/547/518.html https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/311/767/570272/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/386/668/632347/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12700869242131951963 https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145648/house-v-bell/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-8990.pdf http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/04a0345p-06.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	5575876 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	15078 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1076296224 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Capital_punishment dbr:Pro_se dbr:Schlup_v._Delo dbr:Conviction_(law) dbr:DNA dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit dbr:Utah dbr:Default_(law) dbr:Ineffective_assistance_of_counsel dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Confession_(law) dbr:Tennessee_Supreme_Court dbr:Appeal dbr:Luttrell,_Tennessee dbr:Parole dbc:United_States_death_penalty_case_law dbr:Jury_instructions dbr:6th_Cir. dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbr:FBI dbr:Forensics dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:Capital_punishment_in_Tennessee dbr:Remand_(court_procedure) dbr:Habeas_corpus dbc:Union_County,_Tennessee dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Trial dbr:Circumstantial_evidence dbr:Knoxville,_Tennessee dbr:Certiorari dbr:Sexual_assault dbr:Semen dbr:Tennessee_Court_of_Criminal_Appeals dbr:F.3d dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Paul_Gregory_House
dbp:arguedate	0001-01-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	House v. Bell, (en)
dbp:concurrence/dissent	Roberts (en)
dbp:cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-8990.ZS.html
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145648/house-v-bell/
dbp:decidedate	0001-06-12 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket	4 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/547/518.html
dbp:fullname	Paul Gregory House, Petitioner v. Ricky Bell, Warden (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=12700869242131951963
dbp:holding	Post-conviction DNA forensic evidence can be considered in death penalty appeals. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence/dissent	Scalia, Thomas (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:litigants	House v. Bell (en)
dbp:majority	Kennedy (en)
dbp:notparticipating	Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-8990.pdf
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/04-8990
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	25920.0
dbp:uspage	518 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	547 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_death_penalty_case_law dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Capital_punishment_in_Tennessee dbc:Union_County,_Tennessee
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:comment	House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case challenging the permissibility of new DNA forensic evidence that becomes available post-conviction, in capital punishment appeals when those claims have defaulted pursuant to state law. The Court found that admitting new DNA evidence was in line with Schlup v. Delo (1995), which allows cases to be reopened in light of new evidence. (en)
rdfs:label	House v. Bell (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:House v. Bell yago-res:House v. Bell wikidata:House v. Bell https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4nKAo
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:House_v._Bell?oldid=1076296224&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:House_v._Bell
foaf:name	Paul Gregory House, Petitioner v. Ricky Bell, Warden (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:House_v_Bell dbr:547_U.S._518
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Bell_House dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Roberts_Court dbr:House_v_Bell dbr:547_U.S._518
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:House_v._Bell