An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Holmes v. United States, 391 U.S. 936 (1968), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for writ of certiorari to a Jehovah's Witnesses minister who asked the Court to decide whether a draft of men into the Armed Forces in times of peace is constitutionally permissible. The minister argued that, in the absence of a declaration of war, a draft was not authorized and was equivalent to involuntary servitude.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Holmes v. United States, 391 U.S. 936 (1968), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for writ of certiorari to a Jehovah's Witnesses minister who asked the Court to decide whether a draft of men into the Armed Forces in times of peace is constitutionally permissible. The minister argued that, in the absence of a declaration of war, a draft was not authorized and was equivalent to involuntary servitude. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 14033959 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3800 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1051758263 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:case
  • Holmes v. United States, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Stewart (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1968 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Douglas (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Albert H. Holmes v. United States (en)
dbp:holding
  • Certiorari denied. (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Holmes v. United States (en)
dbp:openjurist
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 936 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 391 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Holmes v. United States, 391 U.S. 936 (1968), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for writ of certiorari to a Jehovah's Witnesses minister who asked the Court to decide whether a draft of men into the Armed Forces in times of peace is constitutionally permissible. The minister argued that, in the absence of a declaration of war, a draft was not authorized and was equivalent to involuntary servitude. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Holmes v. United States (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Albert H. Holmes v. United States (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License