About: Harris v. Quinn

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Harris v. Quinn, 573 U.S. 616 (2014), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court regarding provisions of Illinois state law that allowed a union security agreement. Since the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 prohibited the closed shop, states could still choose whether to allow unions to collect fees from non-union members since the collective agreements with the employer would still benefit non-union members. The Court decided 5–4 that Illinois's Public Labor Relations Act, which permitted the union security agreements, violated the First Amendment. A similar case was decided in 2018 called Janus v AFSCME.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Harris v. Quinn, 573 U.S. 616 (2014), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court regarding provisions of Illinois state law that allowed a union security agreement. Since the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 prohibited the closed shop, states could still choose whether to allow unions to collect fees from non-union members since the collective agreements with the employer would still benefit non-union members. The Court decided 5–4 that Illinois's Public Labor Relations Act, which permitted the union security agreements, violated the First Amendment. A similar case was decided in 2018 called Janus v AFSCME. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/616/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20110901168 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/11-681 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-681_j426.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	43181813 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	7154 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1100035844 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Rod_Blagojevich dbr:Samuel_Alito dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_involving_the_First_Amendment dbr:Democratic_Party_(United_States) dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Pat_Quinn_(politician) dbr:United_States_Constitution dbc:Service_Employees_International_Union_litigation dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbr:SEIU dbr:Elena_Kagan dbr:Governor_of_Illinois dbc:United_States_public_employment_case_law dbr:Closed_shop dbr:Medicaid dbr:7th_Cir. dbr:Abood_v._Detroit_Board_of_Education dbc:United_States_Free_Speech_Clause_case_law dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Labor_unions_in_the_United_States dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Collective_bargaining dbr:Illinois dbr:Certiorari dbr:First_Amendment dbr:National_Right_to_Work_Legal_Defense_Foundation dbr:Union_security_agreement dbr:Janus_v_AFSCME dbr:F.3d dbr:US_labor_law dbr:Taft-Hartley_Act_of_1947
dbp:arguedate	0001-01-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2014 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Harris v. Quinn, (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-06-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2014 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Kagan (en)
dbp:docket	11 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Pamela Harris, et al., Petitioners v. Pat Quinn, Governor of Illinois, et al. (en)
dbp:holding	The First Amendment prohibits the collection of an agency fee from Rehabilitation Program PAs who do not want to join or support the union (en)
dbp:joindissent	Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/616/
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:United_States_Constitution dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:litigants	Harris v. Quinn (en)
dbp:majority	Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-681_j426.pdf
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/11-681
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	25920.0
dbp:uspage	616 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	573 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Portal_bar dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:US1stAmendment
dcterms:subject	dbc:Service_Employees_International_Union_litigation dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbc:United_States_public_employment_case_law dbc:United_States_Free_Speech_Clause_case_law dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Harris v. Quinn, 573 U.S. 616 (2014), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court regarding provisions of Illinois state law that allowed a union security agreement. Since the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 prohibited the closed shop, states could still choose whether to allow unions to collect fees from non-union members since the collective agreements with the employer would still benefit non-union members. The Court decided 5–4 that Illinois's Public Labor Relations Act, which permitted the union security agreements, violated the First Amendment. A similar case was decided in 2018 called Janus v AFSCME. (en)
rdfs:label	Harris v. Quinn (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Harris v. Quinn yago-res:Harris v. Quinn wikidata:Harris v. Quinn https://global.dbpedia.org/id/m6BG
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Harris_v._Quinn?oldid=1100035844&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Harris_v._Quinn
foaf:name	(en) Pamela Harris, et al., Petitioners v.Pat Quinn,Governor of Illinois, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Harris_v_Quinn
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Robert_Sampson_(politician) dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_involving_the_First_Amendment dbr:Washington_State_Department_of_Health dbr:Janus_v._AFSCME dbr:Freedom_Foundation_(Washington) dbr:Knox_v._Service_Employees_International_Union,_Local_1000 dbr:National_Right_to_Work_Legal_Defense_Foundation dbr:University_of_Pennsylvania_Journal_of_Business_Law dbr:Harris_v_Quinn
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Harris_v._Quinn