| dbo:abstract
|
- Goss v Chilcott [1996] UKPC 17 (23 May 1996) is a decision of the Privy Council on appeal from New Zealand relating to the law of restitution, and in particular the requirements of total failure of consideration in relation to loans where some repayments had been made, and the defence of change of position. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 13199 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:appealedFrom
| |
| dbp:citations
|
- [1996] UKPC 17, [1996] AC 788 (en)
|
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:decisionBy
|
- Lord Goff of Chieveley (en)
|
| dbp:fullName
|
- Murray Goss, and Jennifer Goss v Laurence Chilcott, and Central Acceptance Limited (en)
|
| dbp:imagesize
| |
| dbp:judges
| |
| dbp:keywords
|
- restitution, failure of consideration, change of position (en)
|
| dbp:name
| |
| dbp:numberOfJudges
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Goss v Chilcott [1996] UKPC 17 (23 May 1996) is a decision of the Privy Council on appeal from New Zealand relating to the law of restitution, and in particular the requirements of total failure of consideration in relation to loans where some repayments had been made, and the defence of change of position. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
