An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Georgia v. Brailsford, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 415 (1793), was a United States Supreme Court case continuing the case of Georgia v. Brailsford (1792). Here, the court held that "upon a motion to dissolve that injunction, this court held that, if the state of Georgia had the title in the debt, (upon which no opinion was then expressed,) she had an adequate remedy at law by action upon the bond; but, in order that the money might be kept for the party to whom it belonged, ordered the injunction to be continued till the next term, and, if Georgia should not then have instituted her action at common law, to be dissolved."

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Georgia v. Brailsford, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 415 (1793), was a United States Supreme Court case continuing the case of Georgia v. Brailsford (1792). Here, the court held that "upon a motion to dissolve that injunction, this court held that, if the state of Georgia had the title in the debt, (upon which no opinion was then expressed,) she had an adequate remedy at law by action upon the bond; but, in order that the money might be kept for the party to whom it belonged, ordered the injunction to be continued till the next term, and, if Georgia should not then have instituted her action at common law, to be dissolved." (en)
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 22667119 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2359 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1116602011 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:argueyear
  • 1792 (xsd:integer)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-02-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1792 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Blair (en)
  • Iredell (en)
dbp:fullname
  • State of Georgia v. Brailsford (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Wilson, Cushing, Rutledge (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Georgia v. Brailsford (en)
dbp:majority
  • Jay (en)
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 2 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 415 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 2 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Georgia v. Brailsford, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 415 (1793), was a United States Supreme Court case continuing the case of Georgia v. Brailsford (1792). Here, the court held that "upon a motion to dissolve that injunction, this court held that, if the state of Georgia had the title in the debt, (upon which no opinion was then expressed,) she had an adequate remedy at law by action upon the bond; but, in order that the money might be kept for the party to whom it belonged, ordered the injunction to be continued till the next term, and, if Georgia should not then have instituted her action at common law, to be dissolved." (en)
rdfs:label
  • Georgia v. Brailsford (1793) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • State of Georgia v. Brailsford (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License