An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the standards governing awards of attorneys' fees in copyright cases. The Copyright Act of 1976 authorizes, but does not require, the court to award attorneys' fees to "the prevailing party" in a copyright action. In Fogerty, the Court held that such attorneys'-fees awards are discretionary, and that the same standards should be applied in the case of a prevailing plaintiff and a prevailing defendant.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the standards governing awards of attorneys' fees in copyright cases. The Copyright Act of 1976 authorizes, but does not require, the court to award attorneys' fees to "the prevailing party" in a copyright action. In Fogerty, the Court held that such attorneys'-fees awards are discretionary, and that the same standards should be applied in the case of a prevailing plaintiff and a prevailing defendant. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 8948908 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 8960 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1018426846 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-12-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1993 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Thomas (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-03-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1994 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • John Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. (en)
dbp:holding
  • In copyright suits, prevailing defendants receive attorney's fees solely at the court's discretion, just as prevailing plaintiffs do. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Rehnquist (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 17280.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 517 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 510 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the standards governing awards of attorneys' fees in copyright cases. The Copyright Act of 1976 authorizes, but does not require, the court to award attorneys' fees to "the prevailing party" in a copyright action. In Fogerty, the Court held that such attorneys'-fees awards are discretionary, and that the same standards should be applied in the case of a prevailing plaintiff and a prevailing defendant. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • John Fogertyv. Fantasy, Inc. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License