| dbo:abstract
|
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502 (2009), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld regulations of the Federal Communications Commission that ban "fleeting expletives" on television broadcasts, finding they were not arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. The constitutional issue, however, was not resolved and was remanded to the Second Circuit and re-appealed to the Supreme Court for a decision in June 2012. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 10413 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-04 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-04-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
|
- Stevens (en)
- Breyer (en)
- Ginsburg (en)
|
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Federal Communications Commission, Petitioner v. Fox Television Stations, Respondent (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- The Federal Communications Commission had not acted arbitrarily when it changed a long-standing policy and implemented a new ban on even "fleeting expletives" from the airwaves. The Court explicitly declined to decide whether the new rule is constitutional, and sent that issue back to the lower courts for their review. (en)
|
| dbp:joindissent
|
- Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Thomas, Alito; Kennedy (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:subsequent
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502 (2009), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld regulations of the Federal Communications Commission that ban "fleeting expletives" on television broadcasts, finding they were not arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. The constitutional issue, however, was not resolved and was remanded to the Second Circuit and re-appealed to the Supreme Court for a decision in June 2012. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2009) (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Federal Communications Commission, Petitioner v. Fox Television Stations, Respondent (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
