About: Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald, 546 U.S. 470 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving claims for racial discrimination against the right to make and enforce contracts under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, a key civil rights provision in U.S. law that was originally enacted as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Court ruled unanimously, in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, that because agents of parties to contracts do not personally have rights under those contracts, they cannot state a claim under section 1981.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald, 546 U.S. 470 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving claims for racial discrimination against the right to make and enforce contracts under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, a key civil rights provision in U.S. law that was originally enacted as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Court ruled unanimously, in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, that because agents of parties to contracts do not personally have rights under those contracts, they cannot state a claim under section 1981. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 5196391 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 12174 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1029092907 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-12-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2005 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-02-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 4 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc., et al. v. John McDonald (en)
dbp:holding
  • The agent of a party to a contract cannot state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, because he himself does not have rights to make or enforce under the contract. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald (en)
dbp:majority
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • Dismissed, No. 02-00311 ; reversed, 107 Fed. Appx. 18 ; rehearing denied ; cert. granted, 125 S. Ct. 1928 (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 470 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 546 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald, 546 U.S. 470 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving claims for racial discrimination against the right to make and enforce contracts under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, a key civil rights provision in U.S. law that was originally enacted as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Court ruled unanimously, in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, that because agents of parties to contracts do not personally have rights under those contracts, they cannot state a claim under section 1981. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Domino's Pizza, Inc., et al. v. John McDonald (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License