| dbo:abstract
|
- Doe v. Reed, 561 U.S. 186 (2010), is a United States Supreme Court case which holds that the disclosure of signatures on a referendum does not violate the Petition Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 8188 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-04-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
| |
| dbp:concurrence
|
- Stevens (en)
- Sotomayor (en)
- Breyer (en)
- Scalia (en)
- Alito (en)
|
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Doe et al v. Reed, Washington Secretary of State, et al. (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- Disclosure of referendum petitions does not as a general matter violate the Petition Clause of the First Amendment. (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence
|
- Breyer (en)
- Stevens, Ginsburg (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Doe v. Reed, 561 U.S. 186 (2010), is a United States Supreme Court case which holds that the disclosure of signatures on a referendum does not violate the Petition Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Doe et al v. Reed, Washington Secretary of State, et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
