An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case involving the standing of taxpayers to challenge state tax laws in federal court. The Court unanimously ruled that state taxpayers did not have standing under Article III of the United States Constitution to challenge state tax or spending decisions simply by virtue of their status as taxpayers. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the majority opinion (his fifth on the Court), which was joined by all of the justices except for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who concurred separately.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case involving the standing of taxpayers to challenge state tax laws in federal court. The Court unanimously ruled that state taxpayers did not have standing under Article III of the United States Constitution to challenge state tax or spending decisions simply by virtue of their status as taxpayers. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the majority opinion (his fifth on the Court), which was joined by all of the justices except for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who concurred separately. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 5366996 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 13589 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1076046846 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Ginsburg (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket
  • 4 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • DaimlerChrysler Corporation v. Charlotte Cuno, et al. (en)
dbp:holding
  • State taxpayers do not have standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution to challenge state tax or spending in federal court simply by virtue of their status as taxpayers. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated in part and remanded. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer, Alito (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno (en)
dbp:majority
  • Roberts (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:otherSource
  • Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 25920.0
dbp:uspage
  • 332 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 547 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case involving the standing of taxpayers to challenge state tax laws in federal court. The Court unanimously ruled that state taxpayers did not have standing under Article III of the United States Constitution to challenge state tax or spending decisions simply by virtue of their status as taxpayers. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the majority opinion (his fifth on the Court), which was joined by all of the justices except for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who concurred separately. (en)
rdfs:label
  • DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • DaimlerChrysler Corporation v. Charlotte Cuno, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License