About: Counselman v. Hitchcock

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 (1892), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that not incriminating an individual for testimony was not the same as not requiring them to testify at all. The court reasoned that as long as evidence arising from the compelled testimony could incriminate the individual in any way, the Fifth Amendment guarantee against self-incrimination was not satisfied. The court then adopted the broader "transactional immunity" rule.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 (1892), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that not incriminating an individual for testimony was not the same as not requiring them to testify at all. The court reasoned that as long as evidence arising from the compelled testimony could incriminate the individual in any way, the Fifth Amendment guarantee against self-incrimination was not satisfied. The court then adopted the broader "transactional immunity" rule. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/142/547.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=8370761441591025818 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/142/547/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93234/counselman-v-hitchcock/ http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep142/usrep142547/usrep142547.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	29880310 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	2395 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1067500301 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbc:1892_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Fifth_Amendment_self-incrimination_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Fuller_Court dbc:Legal_history_of_Illinois dbr:L._Ed. dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Transactional_immunity dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Circuit_Court_of_the_United_States_for_the_Northern_District_of_Illinois
dbp:arguedatea	0001-12-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:arguedateb	10 (xsd:integer)
dbp:argueyear	1891 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Counselman v. Hitchcock, (en)
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93234/counselman-v-hitchcock/
dbp:decidedate	0001-01-11 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1892 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/142/547.html
dbp:fullname	Counselman v. Hitchcock (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=8370761441591025818
dbp:joinmajority	unanimous (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/142/547/
dbp:litigants	Counselman v. Hitchcock (en)
dbp:loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep142/usrep142547/usrep142547.pdf
dbp:majority	Blatchford (en)
dbp:parallelcitations	12 (xsd:integer)
dbp:prior	Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois (en)
dbp:uspage	547 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	142 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:US4thAmendment dbt:US-case-law-stub
dcterms:subject	dbc:1892_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Fifth_Amendment_self-incrimination_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Fuller_Court dbc:Legal_history_of_Illinois
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 (1892), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that not incriminating an individual for testimony was not the same as not requiring them to testify at all. The court reasoned that as long as evidence arising from the compelled testimony could incriminate the individual in any way, the Fifth Amendment guarantee against self-incrimination was not satisfied. The court then adopted the broader "transactional immunity" rule. (en)
rdfs:label	Counselman v. Hitchcock (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Counselman v. Hitchcock yago-res:Counselman v. Hitchcock wikidata:Counselman v. Hitchcock https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4iSEk
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Counselman_v._Hitchcock?oldid=1067500301&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Counselman_v._Hitchcock
foaf:name	(en) Counselman v. Hitchcock (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:142_U.S._547 dbr:Counselman_v_Hitchcock
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_142 dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Fuller_Court dbr:142_U.S._547 dbr:Counselman_v_Hitchcock
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Counselman_v._Hitchcock