About: Cooper v Hobart

An Entity of Type: place, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Cooper v Hobart, 2001 SCC 79 is a Supreme Court of Canada case that redefined the "Anns test", which was adopted in Kamloops (City of) v Nielsen to establish a duty of care in civil tort cases.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Cooper v Hobart, 2001 SCC 79 is a Supreme Court of Canada case that redefined the "Anns test", which was adopted in Kamloops (City of) v Nielsen to establish a duty of care in civil tort cases. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 2779883 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2648 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1059799246 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • Cooper v Hobart (en)
dbp:citations
  • 2001 (xsd:integer)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 2001-11-16 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket
  • 27880 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Mary Francis Cooper v. Robert J. Hobart and Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of British Columbia (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 2001-06-20 (xsd:date)
dbp:notparticipating
  • L'Heureux-DubĂ© and Iacobucci JJ (en)
dbp:ratio
  • A Registrar does not owe a duty of care to investors (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal dismissed (en)
dbp:scc
  • 2000 (xsd:integer)
dbp:unanimous
  • McLachlin CJ and Major J (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Cooper v Hobart, 2001 SCC 79 is a Supreme Court of Canada case that redefined the "Anns test", which was adopted in Kamloops (City of) v Nielsen to establish a duty of care in civil tort cases. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Cooper v Hobart (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License