An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court ruled for the first time that state prison inmates have the standing to sue in federal court to address their grievances under the Civil Rights Act of 1871. This case followed Jones v. Cunningham (1963) allowing prison inmates to employ a writ of habeas corpus to challenge the legality of their sentencing and the conditions of their imprisonment.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court ruled for the first time that state prison inmates have the standing to sue in federal court to address their grievances under the Civil Rights Act of 1871. This case followed Jones v. Cunningham (1963) allowing prison inmates to employ a writ of habeas corpus to challenge the legality of their sentencing and the conditions of their imprisonment. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 14650861 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 4215 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1049879335 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:case
  • Cooper v. Pate, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1964 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Cooper v. Pate, warden (en)
dbp:holding
  • The judgment by the District Court, stating the lower courts were in error to dismiss the stated cause of action as the petitioner is entitled to have his case heard on its merits, was reverted. (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Cooper v. Pate (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:percuriam
  • yes (en)
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 546 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 378 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court ruled for the first time that state prison inmates have the standing to sue in federal court to address their grievances under the Civil Rights Act of 1871. This case followed Jones v. Cunningham (1963) allowing prison inmates to employ a writ of habeas corpus to challenge the legality of their sentencing and the conditions of their imprisonment. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Cooper v. Pate (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Cooper v. Pate, warden (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License