About: Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of the Connecticut sex offender registration requirement which required public disclosure of information on sex offenders after they had been released from incarceration. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/271/38/597893/ https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/538/1.html https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/538/1/ https://web.archive.org/web/20080218051741/http:/www.rcfp.org/news/documents/20020719conndpsvdo.html https://web.archive.org/web/20080514004204/http:/www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2001/2pet/5ami/2001-1231.pet.ami.html https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/01-1231.ZO.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/01-1231 https://www.aclu.org/scotus/2002/21803lgl20021002.html http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep538/usrep538001/usrep538001.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	16324396 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	6594 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	993848811 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbc:2003_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Megan's_Law dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbr:Injunction dbr:Internet dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Connecticut dbc:Sex_offender_registration dbc:Sex_offender_registries_in_the_United_States dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Enjoin dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_criminal_due_process_case_law dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Certiorari dbr:Sex_offender dbr:General_public dbr:Website dbr:Sex_offender_registries_in_the_United_States dbr:F.3d
dbp:arguedate	0001-11-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2002 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe, (en)
dbp:concurrence	Souter (en) Stevens (en) Scalia (en)
dbp:cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/01-1231.ZO.html
dbp:decidedate	0001-03-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2003 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/538/1.html
dbp:fullname	Connecticut Department of Public Safety, et al., Petitioners v. John Doe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (en)
dbp:holding	The Second Circuit's judgment must be reversed because due process does not require the opportunity to prove a fact that is not material to the State's statutory scheme. Mere injury to reputation, even if defamatory, does not constitute the deprivation of a liberty interest. (en)
dbp:joinconcurrence	Ginsburg (en)
dbp:joinmajority	O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/538/1/
dbp:litigants	Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe (en)
dbp:loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep538/usrep538001/usrep538001.pdf
dbp:majority	Rehnquist (en)
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/01-1231
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	25920.0
dbp:uspage	1 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	538 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Quotation dbt:Reflist dbt:Sic dbt:Ussc dbt:Sex_offender_registries_in_the_United_States
dcterms:subject	dbc:2003_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:Sex_offender_registration dbc:Sex_offender_registries_in_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_criminal_due_process_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRehnquistCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:comment	Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of the Connecticut sex offender registration requirement which required public disclosure of information on sex offenders after they had been released from incarceration. (en)
rdfs:label	Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe yago-res:Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe wikidata:Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4iKpz
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Connecticut_Department_of_Public_Safety_v._Doe?oldid=993848811&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Connecticut_Department_of_Public_Safety_v._Doe
foaf:name	(en) Connecticut Department of Public Safety, et al., Petitioners v. John Doe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:538_U.S._1 dbr:Connecticut_Department_of_Public_Safety_v_Doe dbr:Connecticut_Dept._of_Public_Safety_v._Doe
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Constitutionality_of_sex_offender_registries_in_the_United_States dbr:538_U.S._1 dbr:Connecticut_Department_of_Public_Safety_v_Doe dbr:Connecticut_Dept._of_Public_Safety_v._Doe
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Connecticut_Department_of_Public_Safety_v._Doe