| dbo:abstract
|
- Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth), is the only case in which the High Court issued a certificate under section 74 of the Constitution to permit an appeal to the Privy Council on a constitutional question. The Privy Council did not answer the question asked by the High Court, and the court never issued another certificate of appeal. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 11592 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:citations
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
|
- 1912-10-22 (xsd:date)
- 1913-12-17 (xsd:date)
|
| dbp:imagesize
| |
| dbp:italicTitle
| |
| dbp:judges
| |
| dbp:name
|
- Attorney-General v Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd (en)
- Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (en)
|
| dbp:opinions
|
- The Royal Commission Act was invalid (en)
- ' The Royal Commission Act was valid
' the Royal commission could only compel evidence on matters within the power of the Commonwealth (per Griffith CJ and Barton J) (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth), is the only case in which the High Court issued a certificate under section 74 of the Constitution to permit an appeal to the Privy Council on a constitutional question. The Privy Council did not answer the question asked by the High Court, and the court never issued another certificate of appeal. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth) (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
