| dbp:shortsummary
|
- Two days after her disappearance, Dawn Ashworth’s body is found hidden in undergrowth — only a few hundred yards from where Lynda’s body was discovered less than three years earlier. Like Lynda, she has been raped and strangled. DCS Baker is back on the case — convinced one man is responsible for both assaults. This time, the investigation bears fruit. A teenager from the area, seen acting suspiciously during the search, confesses to her killing under lengthy police questioning. However, he refuses to admit he had anything to do with Lynda Mann’s death. Reading about Jeffreys’s DNA work in a local paper, Baker approaches him at the university — perhaps this new DNA test can prove the teenager’s involvement in Lynda’s death as well? Jeffreys is hesitant — the DNA sample from that murder scene is nearly three years old, and his technique was not designed for criminal investigation. Furthermore, with the use of such DNA testing in legal cases currently limited to paternity and immigration lawsuits, would such evidence be accepted in a criminal court? Jeffreys proceeds, but his testing shows not only that the teenager did not kill Lynda Mann, but that he wasn’t involved in Dawn’s murder, either — his confession to the police was false. Although this is a huge setback for the investigation, Jeffreys does succeed in generating DNA fingerprints of the assailant from both attacks, and the two match each other — confirming Baker’s theory that the same person murdered both girls. (en)
- To a storm of publicity, the police release the teenage suspect and the world is introduced to forensic DNA analysis. Among area residents there’s a grim realization that a serial murderer remains in their midst — and is likely to strike again. Baker calls together his team, some of whom doubt the new science — believing they’ve now freed a guilty man. Baker tells them to go back to square one: the statements and paperwork from the investigation must be reviewed again. A Crimewatch special is filmed of Dawn’s fateful last journey and an emotional appeal made to the public...but no promising leads come of it. Baker realizes the usual routes of enquiry just aren’t working and comes to believe DNA fingerprinting holds more promise. He proposes to Jeffreys a plan to test every man in the area between ages 18 and 34, seeking a match to the killer’s DNA profile now in evidence. Jeffreys cautiously agrees with the plan in principle. Both men are keenly aware of the high stakes and risk of failure, but also realize that the plan represents the most realistic chance of solving both murders — and of preventing further such attacks. (en)
- Baker makes a plea to his superiors for the resources needed for mass DNA profiling. Despite the vast expense, in the end the Home Office concede, under pressure from the prime minister. Testing is to be carried out by the Forensic Science Service. Each of the roughly 5,000 men within the target group is to receive an official letter of invitation — though, to protect civil liberties, it is agreed that their participation must be voluntary. Yet, for the program to succeed, it will need the community’s acceptance and for nearly all the men in the group to give a blood sample. Will this large-scale "experiment" succeed in tracking down the killer? (en)
- In early January 1987, the testing program begins in earnest. Young men from the three-village area nearest the two assaults voluntarily line up to provide blood samples for DNA fingerprinting. Initial turnout is good, but it soon becomes evident that generating the profiles will be a slow process. On the plus side, only a fraction of the estimated 5,000 samples to be taken will need full genetic fingerprinting, as many may be excluded based on attributes such as blood type. Even so, for those 1,000 or so remaining samples, the Forensic Science Service estimates that completing the DNA profiling will take five months — likely longer. Meanwhile, Jeffreys is temporarily forced off the project when he falls ill with a viral infection, and is briefly hospitalised. Though his health issues have little impact on the pace of blood-sample testing , the program’s slow progress, high cost and ongoing failure to find a new suspect cause frustration and second-guessing on multiple fronts. There is pressure on the police to either show results, or cut their losses and end the program. (en)
- In mid-September, with nearly all sampling in the targeted area complete, a break in the case occurs: A local woman comes forward claiming she’d overheard in a pub one of her co-workers saying he’d given a blood sample for someone else. Under police questioning, the man admits that he’d provided a blood sample while posing as his boss, Colin Pitchfork, using a falsified passport provided by Pitchfork. DCS Baker and his team recover Pitchfork’s doctored passport from his workplace, and take him into custody. A DNA profile of Pitchfork’s blood proves to be an exact match to those from the crime scenes of both Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth. Pitchfork is charged with — and eventually found guilty of — both their murders, receiving two life sentences in prison. Recognising science’s role in the case, the judge states that without DNA fingerprinting, the killer likely would have remained free. (en)
|
