About: Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court. It held that pharmaceutical sales representatives were not eligible for overtime pay. The court ruled in a majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito that sales representatives were classified as "outside salesmen" who are exempt from the Department of Labor's regulations regarding overtime pay.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court. It held that pharmaceutical sales representatives were not eligible for overtime pay. The court ruled in a majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito that sales representatives were classified as "outside salesmen" who are exempt from the Department of Labor's regulations regarding overtime pay. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20110214128 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/11-204 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-204.pdf https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=8691037892334429353 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/142/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/802408/christopher-v-smithkline-beecham-corp/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-204
dbo:wikiPageID	38052846 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	6604 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1102284005 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Amicus_curiae dbr:Samuel_Alito dbr:Fair_Labor_Standards_Act dbc:GSK_plc_litigation dbr:Pharmaceutical dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbr:United_States_Department_of_Labor dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Arizona dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbr:GlaxoSmithKline dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law dbr:9th_Cir. dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:D._Ariz. dbr:Certiorari dbr:Majority_opinion dbr:US_Department_of_Labor dbr:Class_action_lawsuit dbr:F.3d dbr:Overtime_pay dbr:Sales_representatives dbr:US_labor_law dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-04-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2012 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., (en)
dbp:cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-204
dbp:courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/802408/christopher-v-smithkline-beecham-corp/
dbp:decidedate	0001-06-18 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2012 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Breyer (en)
dbp:docket	11 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Michael Shane Christopher, et al., Petitioners v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation dba GlaxoSmithKline (en)
dbp:googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=8691037892334429353
dbp:holding	The petitioners – pharmaceutical sales representatives whose primary duty is to obtain nonbinding commitments from physicians to prescribe their employer’s prescription drugs in appropriate cases – qualify as outside salesmen under the most reasonable interpretation of the Department of Labor’s regulations. (en)
dbp:italicTitle	force (en)
dbp:joindissent	Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/142/
dbp:lawsapplied	The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938; 29 U.S.C. §§ 206-207 ; 29 U.S.C. § 213 (en)
dbp:litigants	Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. (en)
dbp:majority	Alito (en)
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-204.pdf
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/11-204
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	25920.0
dbp:uspage	142 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	567 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:Slist_worker_scope
dcterms:subject	dbc:GSK_plc_litigation dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court. It held that pharmaceutical sales representatives were not eligible for overtime pay. The court ruled in a majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito that sales representatives were classified as "outside salesmen" who are exempt from the Department of Labor's regulations regarding overtime pay. (en)
rdfs:label	Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. yago-res:Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. wikidata:Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4hr7W
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Christopher_v._SmithKline_Beecham_Corp.?oldid=1102284005&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Christopher_v._SmithKline_Beecham_Corp.
foaf:name	(en) Michael Shane Christopher, et al., Petitioners v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation dba GlaxoSmithKline (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:567_U.S._142 dbr:Christopher_v._SmithKline_Beecham_Corp dbr:Christopher_v_SmithKline_Beecham_Corp. dbr:Christopher_v_SmithKline_Beecham_Corp
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:567_U.S._142 dbr:Christopher_v._SmithKline_Beecham_Corp dbr:Christopher_v_SmithKline_Beecham_Corp. dbr:Christopher_v_SmithKline_Beecham_Corp
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Christopher_v._SmithKline_Beecham_Corp.