An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot preemptively prohibit persons from holding a public meeting, without first notifying the persons involved, and providing the persons an opportunity to argue the decision, unless moving party can show (per the equivalent of today's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65) (1) that they made efforts to give to notice, and (2) explain to the court the reasons why such notice should not be required. The National States Rights Party won the case unanimously.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot preemptively prohibit persons from holding a public meeting, without first notifying the persons involved, and providing the persons an opportunity to argue the decision, unless moving party can show (per the equivalent of today's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65) (1) that they made efforts to give to notice, and (2) explain to the court the reasons why such notice should not be required. The National States Rights Party won the case unanimously. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 34445599 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3597 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1011318460 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-10-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1968 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Carroll v. Princess Anne, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Black (en)
dbp:cornell
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-11-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1968 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Joseph Carroll, et al. v. President and Commissioners of Princess Anne (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Generally, a state cannot preemptively prohibit persons from holding a public meeting without first notifying them and giving them an opportunity to challenge the decision. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Warren, Douglas, Brennan, Harlan, Stewart, White, Marshall (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Fortas (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • 175 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 393 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot preemptively prohibit persons from holding a public meeting, without first notifying the persons involved, and providing the persons an opportunity to argue the decision, unless moving party can show (per the equivalent of today's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65) (1) that they made efforts to give to notice, and (2) explain to the court the reasons why such notice should not be required. The National States Rights Party won the case unanimously. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Joseph Carroll, et al. v. President and Commissioners of Princess Anne (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License