| dbo:abstract
|
- Carbice Corp. v. American Patents Development Corp., 283 U.S. 27 (1931), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court extending the patent misuse doctrine against tie-ins to cases in which patents were used to tie the purchase of unpatented elements of patented combinations. The Court had previously held that it was unlawful to require the purchase of supplies as a condition of a patent license, where the supplies were not claimed as part of the patented combination. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 12496 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedatea
|
- 0001-01-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:arguedateb
|
- 0001-01-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Carbice Corp. v. American Patents Development Corp., (en)
|
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-03-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Carbice Corp. v. American Patents Development Corp. (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- A patentee may not create conditional licenses holding that unpatented materials used in connection with the invention shall be purchased only from the licensor. The limited monopoly to make, use, and vend an article may not be expanded by limitations as to materials and supplies necessary to the operation of it. (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
| |
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Carbice Corp. v. American Patents Development Corp. (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:subsequent
|
- Rehearing granted, ; order entered, . (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Carbice Corp. v. American Patents Development Corp., 283 U.S. 27 (1931), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court extending the patent misuse doctrine against tie-ins to cases in which patents were used to tie the purchase of unpatented elements of patented combinations. The Court had previously held that it was unlawful to require the purchase of supplies as a condition of a patent license, where the supplies were not claimed as part of the patented combination. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Carbice Corp. v. American Patents Development Corp. (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Carbice Corp. v. American Patents Development Corp. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
