| dbo:abstract
|
- Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940), is a landmark court decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment's federal protection of religious free exercise incorporates via the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and so applies to state governments too. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 10247 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-03-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Cantwell v. Connecticut, (en)
|
| dbp:cornell
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-05-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Newton Cantwell, et al. v. State of Connecticut (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment is incorporated against the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
| |
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Cantwell v. Connecticut (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:subsequent
| |
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940), is a landmark court decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment's federal protection of religious free exercise incorporates via the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and so applies to state governments too. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Cantwell v. Connecticut (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Newton Cantwell, et al. v. State of Connecticut (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is rdfs:seeAlso
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
