An Entity of Type: place, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Canadian Council of Churches v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 236, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada case on the law of standing in Canada. In particular, the case sets out the criteria a public-interest group must meet in order to be allowed to mount a constitutional challenge in court.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Canadian Council of Churches v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 236, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada case on the law of standing in Canada. In particular, the case sets out the criteria a public-interest group must meet in order to be allowed to mount a constitutional challenge in court. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 2932381 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 5937 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1052555794 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • Canadian Council of Churches v Canada (en)
dbp:citations
  • [1992] 1 S.C.R. 236 (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 1992-01-23 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket
  • 21946 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • The Canadian Council of Churches v. Her Majesty The Queen and The Minister of Employment and Immigration (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 1991-10-11 (xsd:date)
dbp:history
  • Partial judgment for the Crown and the Minister of Employment and Immigration in the Federal Court of Appeal. (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Lamer C.J. and McLachlin J. (en)
dbp:ratio
  • There are three requirements to decide when there is public interest to grant a party status to file an application to strike down legislation as unconstitutional: Is there a serious issues raised as to the invalidity of the legislation in question? Is the party directly affected by the legislation or, if not, does the plaintiff have a genuine interest in its validity? Is there another reasonable and effective way to bring the issue to the court? If a potential private litigant has the ability to make the application, then the third criterion is not met. (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed. (en)
dbp:scc
  • 1991 (xsd:integer)
dbp:unanimous
  • Cory J. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Canadian Council of Churches v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 236, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada case on the law of standing in Canada. In particular, the case sets out the criteria a public-interest group must meet in order to be allowed to mount a constitutional challenge in court. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Canadian Council of Churches v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License