An Entity of Type: Abstraction100002137, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

In Campbell v. General Dynamics Gov't Sys. Corp., 407 F.3d 546 (1st Cir. 2005), the First Circuit had to consider the enforceability of a mandatory arbitration agreement, contained in a dispute resolution policy linked to an e-mailed company-wide announcement, insofar as it applies to employment discrimination claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Under the Court's analysis, the question turned on whether the employer provided minimally sufficient notice of the contractual nature of the e-mailed policy and of the concomitant waiver of an employee's right to access a judicial forum. The Court weighed the attendant circumstances; concluded that the notice was wanting and that, therefore, enforcement of the waiver would be inappropriate; and upheld the district court's of

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • In Campbell v. General Dynamics Gov't Sys. Corp., 407 F.3d 546 (1st Cir. 2005), the First Circuit had to consider the enforceability of a mandatory arbitration agreement, contained in a dispute resolution policy linked to an e-mailed company-wide announcement, insofar as it applies to employment discrimination claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Under the Court's analysis, the question turned on whether the employer provided minimally sufficient notice of the contractual nature of the e-mailed policy and of the concomitant waiver of an employee's right to access a judicial forum. The Court weighed the attendant circumstances; concluded that the notice was wanting and that, therefore, enforcement of the waiver would be inappropriate; and upheld the district court's of the employer's motion to stay proceedings and compel the employee to submit his claim to arbitration. The case is a principal case in the Rothstein, Liebman employment law casebook. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 24281372 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 5064 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1088196574 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:case
  • 25920.0
dbp:citations
  • 25920.0
dbp:concurrence
  • Lipez (en)
dbp:court
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:courtseal
  • Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.svg (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2005 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Roderick Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corporation and Richard T. Schnorbus (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Howard (en)
dbp:judges
dbp:justia
dbp:litigants
  • Campbell v. General Dynamics Gov't Sys. Corp. (en)
dbp:majority
  • Selya (en)
dbp:otherSource
  • Google Scholar (en)
  • OpenJurist (en)
dbp:otherUrl
dbp:prior
  • 172800.0
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • In Campbell v. General Dynamics Gov't Sys. Corp., 407 F.3d 546 (1st Cir. 2005), the First Circuit had to consider the enforceability of a mandatory arbitration agreement, contained in a dispute resolution policy linked to an e-mailed company-wide announcement, insofar as it applies to employment discrimination claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Under the Court's analysis, the question turned on whether the employer provided minimally sufficient notice of the contractual nature of the e-mailed policy and of the concomitant waiver of an employee's right to access a judicial forum. The Court weighed the attendant circumstances; concluded that the notice was wanting and that, therefore, enforcement of the waiver would be inappropriate; and upheld the district court's of (en)
rdfs:label
  • Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corp. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License