| dbo:abstract
|
- Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 126 F.3d 25, is a 1997 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case that helped define the parameters of personal jurisdiction in the Internet context, specifically for passive websites that only advertise local services. The opinion, written by Judge Ellsworth Van Graafeiland, affirmed the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York's holding that defendant Richard B. King's Internet website did not satisfy New York's long-arm statute requirements for plaintiff Bensusan Restaurant Corporation to bring a trademark infringement suit in New York. The District Court's decision also likened creating a website to merely placing a product into the stream of commerce, and held that such an act was insufficient to satisfy due process and personal jurisdiction requirements. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 10997 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:align
| |
| dbp:arguedate
| |
| dbp:bgcolor
| |
| dbp:border
| |
| dbp:citations
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:courtseal
|
- Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.svg (en)
|
| dbp:decidedate
| |
| dbp:fontsize
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Bensusan Restaurant Corporation v. Richard B. King, individually and doing business as The Blue Note (en)
|
| dbp:holding
|
- In favor of defendant Richard B. King (en)
|
| dbp:judges
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King (en)
|
| dbp:prior
|
- Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 937 F. Supp. 295 (en)
|
| dbp:quote
|
- Personal jurisdiction by acts of non-domiciliaries. Acts which are the basis of jurisdiction. As to a cause of action arising from any of the acts enumerated in this section, a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over any non-domiciliary, or his executor or administrator, who in person or through an agent: . . . 2. commits a tortious act within the state, except as to a cause of action for defamation of character arising from the act; or 3. commits a tortious act without the state causing injury to person or property within the state, except as to a cause of action for defamation of character arising from the act, if he . . . expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce. (en)
|
| dbp:source
|
- N.Y. C.P.L.R. ยง 302 (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 126 F.3d 25, is a 1997 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case that helped define the parameters of personal jurisdiction in the Internet context, specifically for passive websites that only advertise local services. The opinion, written by Judge Ellsworth Van Graafeiland, affirmed the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York's holding that defendant Richard B. King's Internet website did not satisfy New York's long-arm statute requirements for plaintiff Bensusan Restaurant Corporation to bring a trademark infringement suit in New York. The District Court's decision also likened creating a website to merely placing a product into the stream of commerce, and held that such an act was insufficient to satisfy due (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
