About: Beck v. Washington

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541 (1962) is a United States Supreme Court case which ruled that intensive and voluminous news coverage in the vicinity where the defendant was indicted and tried did not violate the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541 (1962) is a United States Supreme Court case which ruled that intensive and voluminous news coverage in the vicinity where the defendant was indicted and tried did not violate the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://apps.oyez.org/player/%23/rehnquist10/opinion_announcement_audio/22228 https://apps.oyez.org/player/%23/warren7/oral_argument_audio/14301 https://apps.oyez.org/player/%23/warren7/oral_argument_audio/14735
dbo:wikiPageID	66208555 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	2516 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1072875302 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbc:Grand_Jury_Clause_case_law dbr:Potter_Stewart dbr:Hugo_Black dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Equal_Protection_Clause dbr:Byron_White dbr:Tom_C._Clark dbr:Washington_(state) dbr:William_J._Brennan_Jr. dbr:William_O._Douglas dbr:Earl_Warren dbr:Felix_Frankfurter dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:1962_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:John_M._Harlan_II
dbp:arguedate	0001-11-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	1961 (xsd:integer)
dbp:decidedate	0001-05-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	1962 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	dbr:Hugo_Black dbr:William_O._Douglas
dbp:docket	40 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	David D. Beck v. State of Washington (en)
dbp:holding	The court held that intensive and voluminous news coverage in the vicinity where the defendant was indicted and tried did not violate the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment (en)
dbp:joindissent	dbr:Earl_Warren
dbp:joinmajority	dbr:Potter_Stewart dbr:William_J._Brennan_Jr. dbr:John_M._Harlan_II
dbp:litigants	Beck v. Washington (en)
dbp:majority	dbr:Tom_C._Clark
dbp:notparticipating	Frankfurter and White (en)
dbp:opinionannouncement	https://apps.oyez.org/player/%23/rehnquist10/opinion_announcement_audio/22228
dbp:oralargument	https://apps.oyez.org/player/%23/warren7/oral_argument_audio/14301
dbp:oralreargument	https://apps.oyez.org/player/%23/warren7/oral_argument_audio/14735
dbp:uspage	541 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	369 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Fifth_Amendment_crimpro dbt:SCOTUS-stub dbt:Infobox_US_Supreme_Court_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:Grand_Jury_Clause_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1962_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541 (1962) is a United States Supreme Court case which ruled that intensive and voluminous news coverage in the vicinity where the defendant was indicted and tried did not violate the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
rdfs:label	Beck v. Washington (en)
owl:sameAs	wikidata:Beck v. Washington https://global.dbpedia.org/id/Fc5eZ
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Beck_v._Washington?oldid=1072875302&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Beck_v._Washington
foaf:name	David D. Beck v.State of Washington (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Beck_v_Washington
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_ca...ing_constitutional_criminal_procedure dbr:Beck_v_Washington
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Beck_v._Washington