An Entity of Type: Abstraction100002137, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Baxter v. Montana, is a Montana Supreme Court case, argued on September 2, 2009, and decided on December 31, 2009, that addressed the question of whether the state's constitution guaranteed terminally ill patients a right to lethal prescription medication from their physicians. The Montana Supreme Court sidestepped the question of if medical aid in dying is guaranteed under Montana State Constitution, but it instead ruled, on narrower grounds, that neither legal precedent nor the state's statute deem such assistance to be against public policy or illegal. Montana is one of ten states in which aid in dying is authorized. The others are California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington; it is authorized in the District of Columbia as well.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Baxter v. Montana ist ein am Obersten Gerichtshof des US-Bundesstaates Montana am 2. September 2009 verhandelter Fall zur Frage ob die Verfassung des Staates Montana unheilbar kranken Personen ein Recht auf den Erwerb tödlicher Medikamente zum Zweck der vorzeitigen Beendigung des eigenen Lebens verleiht. (de)
  • Baxter v. Montana, is a Montana Supreme Court case, argued on September 2, 2009, and decided on December 31, 2009, that addressed the question of whether the state's constitution guaranteed terminally ill patients a right to lethal prescription medication from their physicians. The Montana Supreme Court sidestepped the question of if medical aid in dying is guaranteed under Montana State Constitution, but it instead ruled, on narrower grounds, that neither legal precedent nor the state's statute deem such assistance to be against public policy or illegal. Montana is one of ten states in which aid in dying is authorized. The others are California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington; it is authorized in the District of Columbia as well. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 24200034 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 10508 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1114294367 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-09-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2009 (xsd:integer)
dbp:citationnew
  • MT DA 09-0051, 2009 MT 449 (en)
dbp:courtname
  • Montana Supreme Court (en)
dbp:courtseal
  • Seal_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_Montana.gif (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-12-31 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2009 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Rice (en)
dbp:fullname
  • Robert Baxter, Stephen Speckart, M.D., C. Paul Loehnen, M.D., Lar Autio, M.D., George Risi Jr., M.D., and Compassion & Choices, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. State of Montana and Steve Bullock, Defendants and Appellants (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Hegel (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Cotter, Warner, Morris (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Baxter, et al., v. Montana, et al. (en)
dbp:majority
  • Leaphart (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Baxter v. Montana ist ein am Obersten Gerichtshof des US-Bundesstaates Montana am 2. September 2009 verhandelter Fall zur Frage ob die Verfassung des Staates Montana unheilbar kranken Personen ein Recht auf den Erwerb tödlicher Medikamente zum Zweck der vorzeitigen Beendigung des eigenen Lebens verleiht. (de)
  • Baxter v. Montana, is a Montana Supreme Court case, argued on September 2, 2009, and decided on December 31, 2009, that addressed the question of whether the state's constitution guaranteed terminally ill patients a right to lethal prescription medication from their physicians. The Montana Supreme Court sidestepped the question of if medical aid in dying is guaranteed under Montana State Constitution, but it instead ruled, on narrower grounds, that neither legal precedent nor the state's statute deem such assistance to be against public policy or illegal. Montana is one of ten states in which aid in dying is authorized. The others are California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington; it is authorized in the District of Columbia as well. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Baxter v. Montana (de)
  • Baxter v. Montana (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License