An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990), is a United States corporate law case of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the Michigan Campaign Finance Act, which prohibited corporations from using treasury money to make independent expenditures to support or oppose candidates in elections, did not violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court upheld the restriction on corporate speech, stating, "Corporate wealth can unfairly influence elections"; however, the Michigan law still allowed the corporation to make such expenditures from a segregated fund.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990), is a United States corporate law case of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the Michigan Campaign Finance Act, which prohibited corporations from using treasury money to make independent expenditures to support or oppose candidates in elections, did not violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court upheld the restriction on corporate speech, stating, "Corporate wealth can unfairly influence elections"; however, the Michigan law still allowed the corporation to make such expenditures from a segregated fund. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 15712488 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 6619 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1106599152 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-10-31 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1989 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Stevens (en)
  • Brennan (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-03-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1990 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Kennedy (en)
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Austin, Michigan Secretary of State, et al. v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • The Michigan Campaign Finance Act, which prohibited corporations from using treasury money to support or oppose candidates in elections, did not violate the First or the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • O'Connor, Scalia (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Blackmun, Stevens (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Marshall (en)
dbp:overruled
  • Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:uspage
  • 652 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 494 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990), is a United States corporate law case of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the Michigan Campaign Finance Act, which prohibited corporations from using treasury money to make independent expenditures to support or oppose candidates in elections, did not violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court upheld the restriction on corporate speech, stating, "Corporate wealth can unfairly influence elections"; however, the Michigan law still allowed the corporation to make such expenditures from a segregated fund. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Austin, Michigan Secretary of State, et al. v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License