An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that search of petitioner's offices for business records, their seizure, and subsequent introduction into evidence did not offend the Fifth Amendment's proscription that “[n]o person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” Although the records seized contained statements that petitioner voluntarily had committed to writing, he was never required to say anything.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that search of petitioner's offices for business records, their seizure, and subsequent introduction into evidence did not offend the Fifth Amendment's proscription that “[n]o person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” Although the records seized contained statements that petitioner voluntarily had committed to writing, he was never required to say anything. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 19573396 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3120 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 994702331 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-02-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1976 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Andresen v. Maryland, (en)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1976 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Brennan (en)
  • Marshall (en)
dbp:fullname
  • Peter C. Andresen, Petitioner v. State of Maryland (en)
dbp:holding
  • The searches and seizures were not "unreasonable" in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Burger, Stewart, White, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
dbp:litigants
  • Andresen v. Maryland (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Blackmun (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • Certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland (en)
dbp:uspage
  • 463 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 427 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that search of petitioner's offices for business records, their seizure, and subsequent introduction into evidence did not offend the Fifth Amendment's proscription that “[n]o person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” Although the records seized contained statements that petitioner voluntarily had committed to writing, he was never required to say anything. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Andresen v. Maryland (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Peter C. Andresen, Petitioner v. State of Maryland (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License