About: Public rights

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Public rights Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FPublic_rights

In the United States, public rights, as compared to private rights, belong to citizens but are vested in and vindicated by political entities. Public rights cannot be vindicated by private citizens. A right must normally be a private right to be vindicated in court.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Public rights (en) 公權利 (zh)
rdfs:comment	公權利為人民根據法律，要求公機關行為或不行為的權利。公權利的相對為公權力；也就是公權利行使主因來自公機關公權力之行使。此公權利如源於公權力行使造成侵害所主張時，則稱為主觀性公權利或防禦性公權利。私權利、公權力與人民的公權利有密切關係，例如官方公權力有其影響公共領域消費的力量，但卻同時涉及人民私權利及公權利。 (zh) In the United States, public rights, as compared to private rights, belong to citizens but are vested in and vindicated by political entities. Public rights cannot be vindicated by private citizens. A right must normally be a private right to be vindicated in court. (en)
dcterms:subject	Public sphere Law of the United States
Wikipage page ID	9657146 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1078591903 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Private citizen Private rights Citizen Constitutionality Public sphere Federal government of the United States Flast v. Cohen Access to information Law of the United States Supreme Court of the United States Tax
sameAs	Public rights Public rights Public rights Public rights
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:US-law-stub
has abstract	In the United States, public rights, as compared to private rights, belong to citizens but are vested in and vindicated by political entities. Public rights cannot be vindicated by private citizens. A right must normally be a private right to be vindicated in court. An exception to this general proposition is found in Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968). In Flast, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a private citizen could challenge the constitutionality of a federal tax if the citizen established "a logical link between [their] status [as a taxpayer] and the type of legislative enactment attacked [and] . . . a nexus between that status and the precise nature of the constitutional infringement alleged." In Australia, public rights is an entitlement enjoyed by the community, in contrast to a private or personal entitlement. Such as a claim to tolls on a public highway, a right of ferry. Public rights may exist at common law or under statute. For example, the right of access to information held by the government is existing at common law. (en) 公權利為人民根據法律，要求公機關行為或不行為的權利。公權利的相對為公權力；也就是公權利行使主因來自公機關公權力之行使。此公權利如源於公權力行使造成侵害所主張時，則稱為主觀性公權利或防禦性公權利。私權利、公權力與人民的公權利有密切關係，例如官方公權力有其影響公共領域消費的力量，但卻同時涉及人民私權利及公權利。 (zh)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Public_rights?oldid=1078591903&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	2482 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Public_rights
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Private rights Inter partes review Convention (meeting) Massachusetts v. Mellon Melville Fuller Administrative law in Ukraine Jarkesy v. SEC Manuel Belgrano Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Public_rights

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software