This HTML5 document contains 28 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n4https://books.google.com/
n14https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
dbpedia-fahttp://fa.dbpedia.org/resource/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Wells_effect
rdfs:label
Wells effect
rdfs:comment
The Wells effect describes an empirical disconnect between people's judgment of guilt in a trial setting, and both the mathematical and subjective probability involving guilt. This finding shows that evidence that makes a defendant's guilt more or less probable will not necessarily make a guilty verdict more or less likely, which suggests that the judgments made in courts are not governed by rational decision making.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Psychological_effects dbc:Reasoning dbc:Behavioral_economics
dbo:wikiPageID
55442989
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1045175920
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Gary_L._Wells dbr:Rationality dbc:Reasoning dbr:Probability dbr:Trial dbr:Bounded_rationality dbr:Heuristics_in_judgment_and_decision-making dbr:Base_rate_fallacy dbc:Psychological_effects dbc:Behavioral_economics
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4:books%3Fid=1Yn6NZgxvssC&pg=PA627%7Caccessdate=10 n4:books%3Fid=pyNvZxLFZTQC&pg=PA668%7Caccessdate=10
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q48997699 n14:4Y7DN dbpedia-fa:اثر_ولز
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Cite_book dbt:Reflist
dbo:abstract
The Wells effect describes an empirical disconnect between people's judgment of guilt in a trial setting, and both the mathematical and subjective probability involving guilt. This finding shows that evidence that makes a defendant's guilt more or less probable will not necessarily make a guilty verdict more or less likely, which suggests that the judgments made in courts are not governed by rational decision making.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Wells_effect?oldid=1045175920&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
8685
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Wells_effect