This HTML5 document contains 73 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n17https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n16https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n21https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/548/212/
n7https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n15https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145631/washington-v-recuenco/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
n18https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Washington_v._Recuenco
rdf:type
yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases dbo:Case yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Case107308889 wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Event100029378 dbo:LegalCase yago:Abstraction100002137 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase owl:Thing
rdfs:label
Washington v. Recuenco
rdfs:comment
Washington v. Recuenco, 548 U.S. 212 (2006), is the United States Supreme Court case of Recuenco, a man who was convicted of second-degree assault after he threatened his wife with a handgun, and subsequently sentenced by the Washington Supreme Court based not only on the conviction, but based on Recuenco's use of a handgun, charged as assault with a deadly weapon. His sentencing included a three-year enhancement, a standard based on his being armed with a firearm, which is greater than the one-year enhancement he would have received for assault with a deadly weapon. As the jury in the case had not found that Recuenco was armed with a firearm, he argued that the sentencing enhancement violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial.
foaf:name
Washington v. Arturo R. Recuenco
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_sentencing_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
17850508
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
895904974
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:L._Ed._2d dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Washington_Supreme_Court dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_sentencing_case_law dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n15: n21: n16:scholar_case%3Fcase=16899206213376822819 n18:05-83 n17:05-83.ZS.html
owl:sameAs
n7:4xVBy freebase:m.047f03k wikidata:Q7972590 yago-res:Washington_v._Recuenco
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:SCOTUS-stub dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:Sixth_Amendment dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbp:dissent
Ginsburg Stevens
dbp:joindissent
Stevens
dbp:joinmajority
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer, and Alito
dbp:oyez
n18:05-83
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:uspage
212
dbp:usvol
548
dbp:arguedate
0001-04-17
dbp:argueyear
2006
dbp:case
Washington v. Recuenco, 548 U.S. 212
dbp:courtlistener
n15:
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-26
dbp:decideyear
2006
dbp:fullname
Washington v. Arturo R. Recuenco
dbp:holding
Failure to submit a sentencing factor to the jury is not “structural” error, and therefore does not entitle to reversal of conviction if the error was harmless.
dbp:justia
n21:
dbp:litigants
Washington v. Recuenco
dbp:majority
Thomas
dbo:abstract
Washington v. Recuenco, 548 U.S. 212 (2006), is the United States Supreme Court case of Recuenco, a man who was convicted of second-degree assault after he threatened his wife with a handgun, and subsequently sentenced by the Washington Supreme Court based not only on the conviction, but based on Recuenco's use of a handgun, charged as assault with a deadly weapon. His sentencing included a three-year enhancement, a standard based on his being armed with a firearm, which is greater than the one-year enhancement he would have received for assault with a deadly weapon. As the jury in the case had not found that Recuenco was armed with a firearm, he argued that the sentencing enhancement violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. At the Supreme Court, the State conceded that a Blakely error had occurred, but argued that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court held in a 7-2 opinion that a Blakely error could be considered harmless.
dbp:concurrence
Kennedy
dbp:cornell
n17:05-83.ZS.html
dbp:googlescholar
n16:scholar_case%3Fcase=16899206213376822819
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Washington_v._Recuenco?oldid=895904974&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
2739
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Washington_v._Recuenco