This HTML5 document contains 91 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n21https://www.lawlio.com/opinion/111170/
n20https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n4http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep466/usrep466668/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n10https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/466/668/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n11http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
n7https://www.oyez.org/cases/1983/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
n16https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/693/1243/230453/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n19http://mississippilawjournal.org/category/volume-82/volume-82-number-3/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Strickland_v._Washington
rdf:type
yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Happening107283608 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:LegalCase yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 owl:Thing dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:Case yago:Case107308889 wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Event100029378
rdfs:label
Strickland v. Washington
rdfs:comment
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance. The Court, in a decision by Justice O'Connor, established a two-part test for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim: * Counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. * Counsel's performance gives rise to a reasonable probability that if counsel had performed adequately, the result would have been different.
foaf:name
Strickland, Superintendent, Florida State Prison, v. Washington
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_ineffective_assistance_of_counsel_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1984_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
9131597
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1102825167
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sandra_Day_O'Connor dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Thurgood_Marshall dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:F.2d dbr:Ineffective_assistance_of_counsel dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_ineffective_assistance_of_counsel_case_law dbr:Habeas_corpus dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Eleventh_Circuit dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Premo_v._Moore dbr:Plea_colloquy dbc:1984_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_Florida dbr:William_J._Brennan,_Jr. dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:Wiggins_v._Smith dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_466 dbr:Mitigating_factor dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States dbr:Pepperdine_Law_Review dbr:11th_Cir. dbr:Adversarial_system
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4:usrep466668.pdf n16: n19: n10: n7:82-1554 n21:strickland-v-washington
owl:sameAs
yago-res:Strickland_v._Washington freebase:m.027yvbq n20:4vT4x wikidata:Q7623600
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Ussc dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Reflist dbt:Refimprove dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Sixth_Amendment dbt:Caselaw_source
dbp:dissent
Marshall
dbp:joinmajority
Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:oyez
n7:82-1554
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
668
dbp:usvol
466
dbp:arguedate
0001-01-10
dbp:argueyear
1984
dbp:case
Strickland v. Washington,
dbp:decidedate
0001-05-14
dbp:decideyear
1984
dbp:fullname
Strickland, Superintendent, Florida State Prison, v. Washington
dbp:holding
To obtain relief because of ineffective assistance of counsel, a criminal defendant must show both that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that counsel's deficient performance gives rise to a reasonable probability that if counsel had performed adequately, the result of the proceeding would have been different.
dbp:justia
n10:
dbp:litigants
Strickland v. Washington
dbp:majority
O'Connor
dbp:otherSource
Lawlio
dbp:otherUrl
n21:strickland-v-washington
dbp:loc
n4:usrep466668.pdf
dbo:abstract
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance. The Court, in a decision by Justice O'Connor, established a two-part test for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim: * Counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. * Counsel's performance gives rise to a reasonable probability that if counsel had performed adequately, the result would have been different. The decision was a compromise by the majority in which the varying "tests for ineffective performance of counsel" among the federal circuits and state supreme courts were forced into a singular middle ground test. State governments are free to create a test even more favorable to an appellant.
n11:dissent
Brennan
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Strickland_v._Washington?oldid=1102825167&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
19423
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Strickland_v._Washington