This HTML5 document contains 110 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n15https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/404/71/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n7https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1176235/reed-v-reed/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n23http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n13https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n24http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep404/usrep404071/
n19https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/108404/reed-v-reed/
n8https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/404/
n18http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbpedia-zhhttp://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n25https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/404/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n16https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Reed_v._Reed
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:Case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Case107308889 dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:LegalCase yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Happening107283608 yago:Event100029378 yago:Abstraction100002137 owl:Thing
rdfs:label
Reed v. Reed 里德诉里德案
rdfs:comment
里德訴里德案（英語：Reed v. Reed）， U.S. 71 (1971)，是美國有關平等保護條款的案件，其中最高法院判定財產的管理人不得以性別歧視的方式登記在名下。 Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the administrators of estates cannot be named in a way that discriminates between sexes. In Reed v. Reed the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibited differential treatment based on sex.
foaf:name
Sally M. Reed, Appellant, v. Cecil R. Reed, Administrator, etc.
foaf:depiction
n18:SallyReedSCOTUSMemorial.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:Legal_history_of_Idaho dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbc:1971_in_United_States_case_law dbc:History_of_women's_rights_in_the_United_States dbc:1971_in_Idaho dbc:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation dbc:United_States_gender_discrimination_case_law dbc:United_States_equal_protection_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
1649774
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1105343643
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Ada_County,_Idaho dbr:ACLU dbr:Strict_scrutiny dbr:P.2d dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbr:Equal_Protection_Clause dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States dbr:Moritz_v._Commissioner dbr:L._Ed._2d dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Allen_Derr dbr:Warren_Burger dbr:Idaho dbr:Pauli_Murray dbr:Rational_basis_review dbc:History_of_women's_rights_in_the_United_States dbc:1971_in_United_States_case_law n23:SallyReedSCOTUSMemorial.jpg dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:1971_in_Idaho dbc:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation dbr:Cornelia_Pillard dbc:United_States_gender_discrimination_case_law dbr:Estate_(law) dbr:Probate_Court dbr:Frontiero_v._Richardson dbc:United_States_equal_protection_case_law dbr:Craig_v._Boren dbc:Legal_history_of_Idaho dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Dorothy_Kenyon
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n7: n15: n16:70-4 n8:71 n24:usrep404071.pdf n25:71.html n19:
owl:sameAs
n13:4u2F6 wikidata:Q7306724 freebase:m.05km0j dbpedia-zh:里德诉里德案 yago-res:Reed_v._Reed
dbp:subsequent
17280.0
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Cn dbt:Ussc dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Quote dbt:US14thAmendment
dbo:thumbnail
n18:SallyReedSCOTUSMemorial.jpg?width=300
dbp:joinmajority
unanimous
dbp:oyez
n16:70-4
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
71
dbp:usvol
404
dbp:arguedate
0001-10-19
dbp:argueyear
1971
dbp:case
Reed v. Reed,
dbp:courtlistener
n19:
dbp:decidedate
0001-11-22
dbp:decideyear
1971
dbp:findlaw
n25:71.html
dbp:fullname
Sally M. Reed, Appellant, v. Cecil R. Reed, Administrator, etc.
dbp:holding
Administrators of estates cannot be named in a way that discriminates between sexes.
dbp:justia
n15:
dbp:litigants
Reed v. Reed
dbp:majority
Burger
dbp:loc
n24:usrep404071.pdf
dbo:abstract
Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the administrators of estates cannot be named in a way that discriminates between sexes. In Reed v. Reed the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibited differential treatment based on sex. 里德訴里德案（英語：Reed v. Reed）， U.S. 71 (1971)，是美國有關平等保護條款的案件，其中最高法院判定財產的管理人不得以性別歧視的方式登記在名下。
dbp:cornell
n8:71
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Reed_v._Reed?oldid=1105343643&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
9072
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Reed_v._Reed