This HTML5 document contains 184 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n12https://scholar.google.com/
n21http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep468/usrep468085/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n23http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n6https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n17https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/601/307/1734897/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n13https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/468/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n27https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/463/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n16https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/546/1276/1870641/
n25http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n4https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/468/85/
n22https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/111239/national-collegiate-athletic-assn-v-board-of-regents-of-univ-of-okla/
n24https://www.oyez.org/cases/1983/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
n20https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/707/1147/230037/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:NCAA_v._Board_of_Regents_of_the_University_of_Oklahoma
rdf:type
yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Happening107283608 owl:Thing dbo:Case yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Case107308889 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Event100029378 wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
rdfs:comment
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) television plan violated the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts, which were designed to prohibit group actions that restrained open competition and trade.
foaf:name
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, et al.
foaf:depiction
n25:John_Paul_Stevens,_SCOTUS_photo_portrait.jpg n25:Justice_White_Official.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbc:University_of_Georgia dbc:National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association_litigation dbc:University_of_Oklahoma dbc:College_football_controversies dbc:1984_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Georgia_Bulldogs_football dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:Oklahoma_Sooners_football dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
28614772
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1113058936
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Chuck_Neinas dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_New_Mexico dbr:Restraint_of_trade dbr:Frank_H._Easterbrook dbr:NBC dbr:United_States_service_academies dbr:Group_boycott dbc:National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association_litigation dbr:Sherman_Antitrust_Act_of_1890 dbc:University_of_Georgia dbr:National_Opinion_Research_Center dbr:AP_Poll dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbr:Clayton_Antitrust_Act_of_1914 dbr:United_States_Congress dbr:Sherman_Antitrust_Act dbr:University_of_Pennsylvania dbr:National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association dbr:Associate_Justice_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Waynesburg_University dbr:National_Federation_of_State_High_School_Associations dbr:Pennsylvania_State_University dbr:Affirmative_defense dbr:F._Supp. dbr:Broadcast_Music,_Inc._v._Columbia_Broadcast_System,_Inc. dbr:CBS dbr:Colorado_Buffaloes_football dbr:University_of_Pittsburgh dbr:Broadcasting dbr:Pac-12_Conference dbr:Certiorari dbr:Southeastern_Conference dbr:F.2d dbr:Non-profit_organization dbr:United_States_federal_judge dbr:Price_fixing dbr:National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association_v._Smith dbr:Juan_Guerrero_Burciaga dbr:Injunction dbr:NCAA_Division_I dbr:Maryland_Terrapins_football dbr:USC_Trojans_football n23:Justice_White_Official.jpg dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Big_Eight_Conference dbr:James_Kenneth_Logan dbr:University_of_Oklahoma dbr:William_Rehnquist dbr:Notre_Dame_Football_on_NBC dbr:Big_Ten_Conference dbc:University_of_Oklahoma dbr:2010–2014_NCAA_conference_realignment dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_468 dbr:10th_Cir. dbr:Lee_Roy_West dbr:1939_Waynesburg_vs._Fordham_football_game dbr:University_of_Georgia dbr:American_Broadcasting_Company dbr:Appalachian_State_Mountaineers_football dbr:Rule_of_reason dbc:College_football_controversies dbr:W.D._Okla. dbr:Atlantic_Coast_Conference dbr:Longhorn_Network dbr:Board_of_Regents dbr:Byron_White dbr:University_of_Texas_at_Austin dbr:Joint_venture dbr:Oklahoma_Sooners_football dbr:Fordham_Rams_football dbr:College_Football_Association dbr:Penn_Quakers_football dbr:University_of_Notre_Dame dbr:Coaches'_Poll dbc:Georgia_Bulldogs_football dbc:1984_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Federal_Baseball_Club_v._National_League dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:The_Citadel_Bulldogs_football dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Oklahoma dbr:Texas_Longhorns_football dbr:Solicitor_General_of_the_United_States dbr:Declaratory_judgment dbr:Rex_E._Lee dbr:2021–22_NCAA_conference_realignment dbc:Oklahoma_Sooners_football dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Tenth_Circuit dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law dbr:Stephanie_Kulp_Seymour n23:John_Paul_Stevens,_SCOTUS_photo_portrait.jpg dbr:Western_Athletic_Conference dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:James_Emmett_Barrett dbr:Southwest_Conference dbr:Clayton_Antitrust_Act
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4:case.html n12:scholar_case%3Fcase=6175968099923315390 n13:85.html n16: n17: n20: n22: n27:1311 n24:83-271 n21:usrep468085.pdf
owl:sameAs
n6:fj4w freebase:m.0cz840j wikidata:Q16974521 yago-res:NCAA_v._Board_of_Regents_of_the_University_of_Oklahoma
dbp:subsequent
The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 601 F. Supp. 307
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Refn dbt:University_of_Oklahoma dbt:Usc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Ussc dbt:Main dbt:Good_article dbt:College_football_on_television dbt:Caselaw_source
dbo:thumbnail
n25:John_Paul_Stevens,_SCOTUS_photo_portrait.jpg?width=300
dbp:dissent
White
dbp:joindissent
Rehnquist
dbp:joinmajority
Burger, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, O'Connor
dbp:lawsapplied
; ; and
dbp:oyez
n24:83-271
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
85
dbp:usvol
468
dbp:arguedate
0001-03-20
dbp:argueyear
1984
dbp:case
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma,
dbp:colwidth
45
dbp:courtlistener
n22:
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-27
dbp:decideyear
1984
dbp:findlaw
n13:85.html
dbp:fullname
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, et al.
dbp:group
"fn"
dbp:holding
Holding that the NCAA's television plan violated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and was an unreasonable restraint of trade.
dbp:justia
n4:case.html
dbp:litigants
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
dbp:majority
Stevens
dbp:loc
n21:usrep468085.pdf
dbo:abstract
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 (1984), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) television plan violated the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts, which were designed to prohibit group actions that restrained open competition and trade. The NCAA is an organization that regulates college athletics, and membership is voluntary, although NCAA schools are not allowed to play against non-NCAA teams. The case dealt with television rights to college football games, which were controlled by the NCAA and limited the appearance of university teams in each season. The NCAA believed that their control of television rights protected live attendance, which was disputed by a number of colleges. These larger colleges formed the College Football Association to negotiate television contracts, until the NCAA advised the colleges that they would be banned from all NCAA competitions, not just in football. The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma and the University of Georgia Athletic Association sued to force the NCAA to stop the practice. The Supreme Court held that the NCAA's actions were a restraint of trade and ruled for the universities.
dbp:cornell
n27:1311
dbp:googlescholar
n12:scholar_case%3Fcase=6175968099923315390
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:NCAA_v._Board_of_Regents_of_the_University_of_Oklahoma?oldid=1113058936&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
24740
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:NCAA_v._Board_of_Regents_of_the_University_of_Oklahoma