This HTML5 document contains 544 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n11http://philpapers.org/rec/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n33http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Script/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
dbpedia-kohttp://ko.dbpedia.org/resource/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n35https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n43http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/w2bQ5j5xVahrmnPUrjqQ/
dbpedia-frhttp://fr.dbpedia.org/resource/
n29http://uz.dbpedia.org/resource/
n25http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
dbpedia-bghttp://bg.dbpedia.org/resource/
n7http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
dbpedia-trhttp://tr.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbpedia-pthttp://pt.dbpedia.org/resource/
n27http://ckb.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbpedia-afhttp://af.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbpedia-ruhttp://ru.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbpedia-nlhttp://nl.dbpedia.org/resource/
n39https://abcnews.go.com/US/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
dbpedia-jahttp://ja.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbpedia-arhttp://ar.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbpedia-fyhttp://fy.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbpedia-fahttp://fa.dbpedia.org/resource/
n18http://bn.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbpedia-vihttp://vi.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n31http://www.chabad.org/search/
n46https://www.c-span.org/video/%3F178164-1/
dbpedia-eohttp://eo.dbpedia.org/resource/
n15https://archive.org/details/
dbpedia-zhhttp://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/
n24http://ta.dbpedia.org/resource/
n44http://www.ourcivilisation.com/moral/
n42https://books.google.com/
n16http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wikt:
n26http://hy.dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Good_and_evil
rdf:type
owl:Thing
rdfs:label
선악 Good and evil Добро и зло Goed en kwaad Bono kaj malbono Bem e mal Bien et mal (philosophie) الخير والشر 善悪 善惡
rdfs:comment
الحسنات والسيئات أو الخير والشر هي الأعمال الخيرة والشريرة ودائماً ما يقرن اسمهما على الصراع الدائم بين طيبة القلب وقسوته، وبين الناس وبعضهم وأحيانًا بين بني البشر والشياطين ويرمز أيضًا إلى صراع الإنسان الداخلي لعمل الخير. Dans les domaines religieux, éthique, philosophique et psychologique, « le bien et le mal » est un couple de concepts courant. Dans les cultures d'inspiration manichéenne ou abrahamique, le mal est généralement considéré comme l’opposé du bien, dans lequel le bien devrait prévaloir et le mal aurait vocation à être vaincu. Dans les cultures d'inspiration bouddhiste, le bien et le mal sont perçus comme une dualité antagoniste qui doit elle-même être surmontée en réalisant Śūnyatā, c'est-à-dire la reconnaissance du bien et du mal en tant que principes opposés mais complémentaires. Goed en kwaad is een tegenstelling of spanning die in vele religies, filosofieën, mythen en andere verhalen wordt aangetroffen. In de wetenschap worden de begrippen goed en kwaad in verschillende disciplines en vanuit verschillende invalshoeken bekeken: de ethiek (een tak van de filosofie) bestudeert het verband en het onderscheid tussen goed en kwaad, de psychologie onderzoekt het gedrag en de redenen van mensen die voor het goede of het kwade kiezen, binnen de medische wetenschap wordt onder andere naar biologische verbanden met deze begrippen gezocht en de theologie richt zich op mogelijke manieren van ermee omgaan. Er bestaan verschillende filosofieën om het onderscheid tussen goed en kwaad te kunnen maken, zoals het utilitarisme en consequentialisme. Bono kaj malbono signifas en religio, etiko kaj filozofio moralajn kaj etikajn valor-taksojn. Depende de la cirkonstancoj "bona kaj malbona" povas esprimi individuan taksadon, sociajn normojn aŭ absolutajn valorojn de la homa naturo aŭ de religiaj principoj. En la ĉiutaga lingvo "bona kaj malbona" ankaŭ rilatas al la kvalito de io aŭ iu, aŭ ties taŭgeco. In religion, ethics, philosophy, and psychology "good and evil" is a very common dichotomy. In cultures with Manichaean and Abrahamic religious influence, evil is perceived as the dualistic antagonistic opposite of good, in which good should prevail and evil should be defeated. In cultures with Buddhist spiritual influence, both good and evil are perceived as part of an antagonistic duality that itself must be overcome through achieving Śūnyatā meaning emptiness in the sense of recognition of good and evil being two opposing principles but not a reality, emptying the duality of them, and achieving a oneness. Добро и зло — в философии, этике и религии дихотомия нормативно-оценочных категорий, означающих в обобщённой форме, с одной стороны, должное и нравственно-положительное, а с противоположной — нравственно-отрицательное и осуждаемое. ( 다른 뜻에 대해서는 , 선, 악 (동음이의) 문서를 참조하십시오.)( 선과 악은 여기로 연결됩니다. 영화에 대해서는 선과 악 (영화) 문서를 참고하십시오.) 종교, 윤리학, 철학, 심리학에서 "선과 악" (善惡)은 매우 일반적인 이분법이다. 마니교와 아브라함의 종교적 영향력을 가진 문화에서, 악은 일반적으로 선과는 대립적 반대론으로 인식되며, 선은 이겨야 하고 악은 져야 한다. 불교의 영적 영향을 가진 문화권에서, 선악은 상반된 원칙이지만 실재하지 않으므로, 이중성을 비우고, 일치 시키는 인식의 감각으로, 공을 달성함으로써 극복해야 하는 길항적 이원성의 일부로 인식된다. 일반적으로 악은 선으로 묘사된 것의 부재 또는 반대이다. 종종 악은 심오한 부도덕을 나타내는 데 쓰인다. 일부 종교적 맥락에서, 악은 초자연적인 힘으로 묘사되었다. 악의 정의는 동기의 분석과 마찬가지로 다양하다. 그러나 일반적으로 악과 관련된 요소는 편의성, 이기심, 무지 또는 방임과 관련된 행동과 관련이 있다. 本項目は倫理的な善と悪について述べる。 在宗教、倫理學與哲學中,善(英語:Good)與惡(英語:Evil)是一組常見的二分法(Dichotomy),何為善,何為惡,也是常見的討論主題。
rdfs:seeAlso
dbr:Moral_psychology dbr:Islamic_ethics dbr:Wealth dbr:Yetzer_hara dbr:Devil
foaf:depiction
n7:Don't_Kid_Yourself...it's_Up_to_You._Stop_Him%5E_-_NARA_-_534297.jpg n7:Ary_Scheffer_-_The_Temptation_of_Christ_(1854).jpg n7:Extermination_of_Evil_Sendan_Kendatsuba_crop.jpg n7:Extermination_of_Evil_Tenkeisei_crop.jpg n7:Martin_Luther_by_Cranach-restoration.jpg n7:Lenz_Entwurf_zu_einem_Engel.jpg n7:Codex_Gigas_devil.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:Good_and_evil dbc:Concepts_in_ethics dbc:Ethical_issues_in_religion dbc:Literary_motifs dbc:Dichotomies dbc:Recurring_elements_in_folklore dbc:Sin dbc:Fantasy_tropes dbc:Tropes dbc:Religious_philosophical_concepts dbc:Value_(ethics)
dbo:wikiPageID
53403353
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1124566189
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Sacred dbr:Genocide dbr:Deforestation dbr:Fallen_angel dbr:Agency_(philosophy) dbr:Amorality dbr:Theocracy dbr:Answer_to_Job dbr:Peace_movement dbr:Harmony dbr:Knowledge dbr:Augustine_of_Hippo dbr:Invention dbr:Sect dbr:Taoism dbr:Biodiversity dbr:Positive_psychology dbr:Ecosystem dbr:Inductive_reasoning dbr:Artificial_intelligence dbr:Buddhism dbr:Eudaimonia dbr:Selfless_Service dbr:Poverty dbr:Divine_law dbr:Bar_mitzvah dbr:Wisdom dbr:Ponerology dbr:Proto-Germanic dbr:Pre-Socratic_philosophy dbr:Animal_rights dbr:Rational_Emotive_Behavioral_Therapy dbr:Ancient_Mesopotamian_religion dbr:Existence_of_God dbr:Virtue dbr:Supernatural dbr:David_Ricardo dbr:Duty dbr:Old_High_German dbr:Wealth dbr:Devil dbr:Robert_John_Russell dbr:Value_theory dbr:Christianity dbr:Suicide_attack dbr:Utility dbr:Satan n16:disciple dbr:Creator_deity dbr:Platonic_idealism dbr:Vipassana_movement dbr:Krodh dbr:Buddhahood dbr:Monotheistic dbr:Moral_realism dbr:Labour_power dbr:Kamikaze dbr:Manmukh dbr:Benedict_de_Spinoza dbr:Proto-Indo-European_language dbr:Martinez_Hewlett dbr:Moral_absolutism dbr:Objectivity_(philosophy) dbr:Prabuddha_Bharata dbr:Truth dbr:Biology dbr:Shadow_(psychology) dbr:Scapegoating dbc:Good_and_evil dbr:Statistics dbr:Egypt dbr:Friedrich_Nietzsche dbr:Transhumanism dbr:Punishment dbr:Cognate dbr:Greek_language dbr:First_cause dbr:Salvation dbr:Strike_action dbr:Bhavana dbr:Techno-optimist dbr:Ethical_relationship dbr:Theism dbr:Karl_Marx dbr:Descriptive_ethics dbr:Ted_Peters_(theologian) dbr:Guilt_(emotion) dbr:Philip_Zimbardo dbr:Moral_universalism dbr:The_Principles_of_Morals_and_Legislation dbr:Physical_cosmology dbc:Concepts_in_ethics dbr:International_relations dbr:Theravada dbr:Hankaar dbr:Materialism dbr:John_Stuart_Mill dbr:Congenital dbr:Psychological_projection dbr:Marginal_utility dbr:Immanuel_Kant dbr:Necessary_evil dbr:Mythology dbr:Christian_Bible dbr:Beyond_Good_and_Evil dbr:Objectivist_ethics dbr:Dualistic_cosmology n25:Martin_Luther_by_Cranach-restoration.jpg dbr:Albert_Ellis_(psychologist) dbr:Formal_system dbr:Virtues dbr:Five_Thieves dbr:Marduk dbc:Ethical_issues_in_religion dbr:Morality dbr:Afterlife dbr:Aristotle dbr:Guru_Arjan dbr:Cambridge_University_Press dbr:Sin dbr:Theologian dbr:Graded_absolutism dbr:Use-value n16:Purity dbr:Nonviolence dbr:Welfare_economics dbr:Extinction dbr:Praise dbr:Baháʼí_Faith dbr:Moral dbr:Sanctity dbr:David_Sloan_Wilson dbr:Green_politics dbr:Science_of_morality dbr:Neorealism_(international_relations) dbr:Moh dbr:Life n25:Ary_Scheffer_-_The_Temptation_of_Christ_(1854).jpg dbr:Faith dbr:Balance_(metaphysics) dbr:Descriptive dbr:Habitat_(ecology) dbr:Simran dbr:Nazism dbr:Hedonism dbr:Saints dbr:Monotheism dbr:Iranian_religions dbr:Manichaeism dbr:Hutu dbr:Lobh dbr:Persuasion_technology dbr:Murder dbr:Mahabharata dbr:French-American dbr:Light_(theology) dbr:Deity dbr:Hittite_language dbr:Jesus dbr:Innovation dbr:Climate_change dbr:Ancient_history dbr:%60Abdu'l-Bahá dbr:Divinity dbr:Spirituality dbr:Ahmadiyya dbc:Literary_motifs dbr:Honour dbr:Genetic_engineering dbr:Situated_ethics dbr:New_York_University_Press dbr:Damnation dbr:Extraterrestrial_life dbr:Deities dbr:Amoralism dbr:Bhagavad_Gita dbr:Avot_de-Rabbi_Natan dbr:Gnostics dbr:Abstraction dbr:The_Devil dbr:Animism dbr:Neglect dbr:Self-image dbr:Penguin_Classics dbr:The_Fall_of_Man dbr:Angel dbr:Carl_Jung dbr:Forests dbr:Ormazd dbc:Dichotomies dbr:Applied_ethics dbr:Angra_Mainyu dbr:Religion dbr:Agency_(LDS_Church) dbr:Original_position dbr:Some_Answered_Questions dbr:Creativity dbr:E._O._Wilson dbr:Zoroaster dbr:Great_Ape_personhood dbr:Paramita dbr:Threefold_Training dbr:Democritus dbr:Value_of_Earth dbr:Well-being dbr:Sexual_abstinence n16:ὅσιος dbc:Recurring_elements_in_folklore dbr:Stanford_prison_experiment dbr:Biophilia_hypothesis dbc:Sin dbr:Locust dbr:Selfishness dbr:Old_Saxon dbr:Judeo-Christian dbr:Oxford_University_Press dbr:Niccolò_Machiavelli dbr:David_Hume dbr:Classical_economics dbr:Anton_LaVey dbr:Green_economics dbr:Islam dbr:Form_of_the_Good dbr:Charity_(virtue) dbr:Measuring_well-being dbr:The_Enlightenment dbr:Bushido dbr:Dutch_language dbr:Perfectionism_(philosophy) dbr:Frans_de_Waal dbr:Perfectionism_(psychology) dbr:Emancipation dbr:Labour_market dbr:Collective_identity dbr:Precept dbr:Slavery dbr:Jeremy_Griffith dbr:German_language dbr:Genuine_progress_indicator dbr:Narcissistic_injury dbr:Confucianism dbr:Pyrrhonism dbr:Ahura_Mazda dbr:Dāna dbr:State_terrorism dbr:Tree_of_the_knowledge_of_good_and_evil dbr:Old_Testament dbr:Philanthropy dbr:Bodhisattvas dbr:Mormonism dbr:Innocence dbr:Deep_ecology dbr:Atmosphere dbr:Conceptual_metaphor dbr:Welfarism dbr:Ariel_Durant dbr:Realism_in_international_relations dbr:Criticism dbr:Three_Treasures_(Taoism) dbr:Moral_evil dbr:Isfet_(Egyptian_mythology) dbr:Samadhi n16:siðr dbr:Master–slave_morality dbr:Banality_of_evil dbr:Non-physical_entity dbr:Ontology dbr:Ocean dbr:Bioregionalism dbr:Substantial_form dbr:Political_economy dbr:Arete_(moral_virtue) dbr:Common_good dbr:Gnosis dbr:Kaam dbr:Value_of_life dbr:Tiamat dbr:Last_Judgment dbr:Rwandan_genocide dbr:Monism dbr:Ahriman dbr:Humans dbr:Ethics dbr:Akrasia dbr:My_Lai_Massacre dbr:Dharmayuddha dbr:Thomas_Hurka dbr:Psychology dbr:Ramayana dbr:Śūnyatā dbr:Florence,_Italy dbc:Fantasy_tropes dbr:John_Rawls dbr:Earth dbr:Moral_relativism dbr:Martin_Luther dbr:Utilitarianism dbr:The_Abolition_of_Man dbr:Philosophy dbr:Old_Frisian dbc:Tropes dbr:Plato dbr:Terrorism dbr:Jihadi dbr:Church_Fathers dbr:Environmentalism dbr:Sustainability dbr:Ethics_(Spinoza) dbr:Technological_escalation dbr:Natural_law dbr:Psychopathy dbr:Euthyphro dbr:Demon dbr:C._S._Lewis dbc:Religious_philosophical_concepts dbr:Old_English dbr:Gothic_language dbr:World_War_II dbr:Supreme_good dbr:Polytheism dbr:Immorality dbr:Social_structure dbr:Pantheon_(gods) dbr:Ma'at dbr:Norm_(social) dbr:Book_of_Genesis dbr:Extraterrestrials dbr:Roy_Baumeister dbr:Ecology dbr:Indigenous_peoples dbr:Noble_Eightfold_Path dbr:Late_Antiquity dbr:Natural_evil dbr:Anthropic_principle dbr:Saint dbr:New_Testament dbr:State_of_affairs_(philosophy) dbr:Evil dbr:Ecological_wisdom dbr:Will_Durant dbr:Prajñā_(Buddhism) dbr:Nature n25:Don't_Kid_Yourself...it's_Up_to_You._Stop_Him%5E_-_NARA_-_534297.jpg dbr:Chinese_folk_religion dbr:Embodied_cognition dbr:Dichotomy dbr:Church_of_Satan dbr:Henri_Blocher dbr:Axiology dbr:Neoplatonists dbr:Modern_English dbr:Meher_Baba dbr:Pāli dbr:Thomas_Aquinas dbr:Rape dbr:List_of_ethicists dbr:Seppuku dbr:Contentment dbr:Epicurus dbr:Normative_ethics dbr:Exchange-value dbr:Ignorance dbr:Green_Parties dbr:Anthropological_linguistics dbr:Buddha dbr:Love dbr:Anthropological_theories_of_value dbr:Theodicy dbr:Moral_dilemma dbr:Adam_Smith dbr:Initiation dbr:Law_of_value dbr:Human_evolution_(origins_of_society_and_culture) dbr:Justice dbr:Enlightenment_(spiritual) dbr:Middle_English dbr:M._Scott_Peck dbr:Zoroastrianism dbr:Interahamwe dbr:Enlightenment_in_Buddhism dbr:Gross_national_happiness dbr:Western_culture dbr:A_Theory_of_Justice dbr:Good dbr:Christian_theology dbr:Angels dbr:State_(polity) dbc:Value_(ethics) dbr:Dharma dbr:Abrahamic dbr:Buddhist_scriptures dbr:Free_will dbr:Bertrand_Russell dbr:Jeremy_Bentham dbr:Gurmukh dbr:Gaia_philosophy dbr:Codex_Gigas dbr:Christian_Science dbr:Price dbr:Cultural_universals dbr:God_in_Islam n25:Extermination_of_Evil_Sendan_Kendatsuba_crop.jpg n25:Extermination_of_Evil_Tenkeisei_crop.jpg dbr:Meta-ethics dbr:Realpolitik dbr:Judaism dbr:Dominican_Order dbr:On_the_Genealogy_of_Morals dbr:Happiness dbr:Austin_Farrer
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n11:CHAPTT-6 n11:CHATDO-34 n15:evildemonicnewth0000oppe n31:keyword.asp%3Fkid=1229 n39:story%3Fid=90617&page=1 n42:books%3Fid=OatyHcQmLb4C&q=Steven+Mintz%7C n43:full%7Cjournal n44:moral8.htm n46:evil-investigation
owl:sameAs
dbpedia-fa:خیر_و_شر dbpedia-af:Goed_en_kwaad n18:ভালো_ও_মন্দ dbpedia-vi:Thiện_và_ác dbpedia-ru:Добро_и_зло dbpedia-eo:Bono_kaj_malbono dbpedia-ko:선악 n24:நல்லதும்_கெட்டதும் n26:Բարին_և_չարը_(փիլիսոփայություն) n27:باشە_و_خراپە dbpedia-zh:善惡 n29:Yaxshilik_va_yomonlik dbpedia-tr:İyi_ve_kötü dbpedia-pt:Bem_e_mal dbpedia-fr:Bien_et_mal_(philosophie) n35:91eW dbpedia-ja:善悪 dbpedia-fy:Goed_en_kwea dbpedia-nl:Goed_en_kwaad dbpedia-ar:الخير_والشر freebase:m.01xy4k dbpedia-bg:Добро_и_зло wikidata:Q10797504
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Citation_needed dbt:See_also dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Cite_book dbt:Authority_control dbt:Globalize dbt:Unreferenced_section dbt:Main dbt:Div_col dbt:Div_col_end dbt:Further dbt:More_citations_needed_section dbt:Redirect dbt:In_Our_Time dbt:Multiple_issues dbt:Multiple_image dbt:Reflist dbt:Refend dbt:Refbegin n33:Hebrew dbt:Other_uses dbt:Other_uses_of dbt:Original_research dbt:Good_and_evil dbt:PIE dbt:Quote dbt:Commons_category dbt:Short_description dbt:Wiktionary dbt:Wikiquote dbt:Essay dbt:Portal dbt:ISSN dbt:ISBN dbt:Ethics
dbo:thumbnail
n7:Ary_Scheffer_-_The_Temptation_of_Christ_(1854).jpg?width=300
dbp:align
right
dbp:caption
Satan, as seen in Codex Gigas. Demons are generally seen as evil beings, and Satan as the greatest of these . In many religions, angels are considered good beings. In the Christian tradition, God—being the creator of all life—manifests himself through the son of God, Jesus Christ, who is the personification of goodness.
dbp:direction
vertical
dbp:footerAlign
left/right/center
dbp:headerAlign
left/right/center
dbp:image
Lenz Entwurf zu einem Engel.jpg Codex Gigas devil.jpg
dbp:width
175
dbo:abstract
الحسنات والسيئات أو الخير والشر هي الأعمال الخيرة والشريرة ودائماً ما يقرن اسمهما على الصراع الدائم بين طيبة القلب وقسوته، وبين الناس وبعضهم وأحيانًا بين بني البشر والشياطين ويرمز أيضًا إلى صراع الإنسان الداخلي لعمل الخير. In religion, ethics, philosophy, and psychology "good and evil" is a very common dichotomy. In cultures with Manichaean and Abrahamic religious influence, evil is perceived as the dualistic antagonistic opposite of good, in which good should prevail and evil should be defeated. In cultures with Buddhist spiritual influence, both good and evil are perceived as part of an antagonistic duality that itself must be overcome through achieving Śūnyatā meaning emptiness in the sense of recognition of good and evil being two opposing principles but not a reality, emptying the duality of them, and achieving a oneness. Evil is often used to denote profound immorality. Evil has also been described as a supernatural force. Definitions of evil vary, as does the analysis of its motives. However, elements that are commonly associated with evil involve unbalanced behavior involving expediency, selfishness, ignorance, or neglect. The modern philosophical questions regarding good and evil are subsumed into three major areas of study: meta-ethics concerning the nature of good and evil, normative ethics concerning how we ought to behave, and applied ethics concerning particular moral issues. Dans les domaines religieux, éthique, philosophique et psychologique, « le bien et le mal » est un couple de concepts courant. Dans les cultures d'inspiration manichéenne ou abrahamique, le mal est généralement considéré comme l’opposé du bien, dans lequel le bien devrait prévaloir et le mal aurait vocation à être vaincu. Dans les cultures d'inspiration bouddhiste, le bien et le mal sont perçus comme une dualité antagoniste qui doit elle-même être surmontée en réalisant Śūnyatā, c'est-à-dire la reconnaissance du bien et du mal en tant que principes opposés mais complémentaires. Le mal est souvent assimilé à l'immoralité. Dans certains contextes religieux, le mal a été conçu comme une force surnaturelle. Les définitions du mal varient, tout comme l’analyse de ses motifs. Cependant, les éléments qui sont communément associés au mal impliquent un comportement déséquilibré au travers de l’opportunisme, l’égoïsme, l’ignorance ou la négligence. Les questions philosophiques modernes concernant le bien et le mal sont divisées en trois domaines : la méta-éthique concernant la nature du bien et du mal, l’éthique normative concernant la façon dont nous devrions nous comporter et l’éthique appliquée concernant des questions morales particulières. Bono kaj malbono signifas en religio, etiko kaj filozofio moralajn kaj etikajn valor-taksojn. Depende de la cirkonstancoj "bona kaj malbona" povas esprimi individuan taksadon, sociajn normojn aŭ absolutajn valorojn de la homa naturo aŭ de religiaj principoj. En la ĉiutaga lingvo "bona kaj malbona" ankaŭ rilatas al la kvalito de io aŭ iu, aŭ ties taŭgeco. 本項目は倫理的な善と悪について述べる。 Добро и зло — в философии, этике и религии дихотомия нормативно-оценочных категорий, означающих в обобщённой форме, с одной стороны, должное и нравственно-положительное, а с противоположной — нравственно-отрицательное и осуждаемое. ( 다른 뜻에 대해서는 , 선, 악 (동음이의) 문서를 참조하십시오.)( 선과 악은 여기로 연결됩니다. 영화에 대해서는 선과 악 (영화) 문서를 참고하십시오.) 종교, 윤리학, 철학, 심리학에서 "선과 악" (善惡)은 매우 일반적인 이분법이다. 마니교와 아브라함의 종교적 영향력을 가진 문화에서, 악은 일반적으로 선과는 대립적 반대론으로 인식되며, 선은 이겨야 하고 악은 져야 한다. 불교의 영적 영향을 가진 문화권에서, 선악은 상반된 원칙이지만 실재하지 않으므로, 이중성을 비우고, 일치 시키는 인식의 감각으로, 공을 달성함으로써 극복해야 하는 길항적 이원성의 일부로 인식된다. 일반적으로 악은 선으로 묘사된 것의 부재 또는 반대이다. 종종 악은 심오한 부도덕을 나타내는 데 쓰인다. 일부 종교적 맥락에서, 악은 초자연적인 힘으로 묘사되었다. 악의 정의는 동기의 분석과 마찬가지로 다양하다. 그러나 일반적으로 악과 관련된 요소는 편의성, 이기심, 무지 또는 방임과 관련된 행동과 관련이 있다. 선과 악에 관한 현대 철학적 질문은 연구의 세 가지 주요 영역으로 분류된다: 선과 악의 본질에 관한 초윤리학, 우리가 어떻게 행동해야 하는지에 관한 , 특정 도덕 문제에 관한 응용 윤리학. 在宗教、倫理學與哲學中,善(英語:Good)與惡(英語:Evil)是一組常見的二分法(Dichotomy),何為善,何為惡,也是常見的討論主題。 Goed en kwaad is een tegenstelling of spanning die in vele religies, filosofieën, mythen en andere verhalen wordt aangetroffen. In de wetenschap worden de begrippen goed en kwaad in verschillende disciplines en vanuit verschillende invalshoeken bekeken: de ethiek (een tak van de filosofie) bestudeert het verband en het onderscheid tussen goed en kwaad, de psychologie onderzoekt het gedrag en de redenen van mensen die voor het goede of het kwade kiezen, binnen de medische wetenschap wordt onder andere naar biologische verbanden met deze begrippen gezocht en de theologie richt zich op mogelijke manieren van ermee omgaan. Er bestaan verschillende filosofieën om het onderscheid tussen goed en kwaad te kunnen maken, zoals het utilitarisme en consequentialisme.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Good_and_evil?oldid=1124566189&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
70815
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Good_and_evil