This HTML5 document contains 93 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n20https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/758/390/63700/
n19https://www.oyez.org/cases/1986/
n8https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n16https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/479/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n5https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/479/272/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n17http://www.worldlii.org/us/cases/federal/USSC/1987/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n15http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep479/usrep479272/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:California_Federal_Savings_and_Loan_Association_v._Guerra
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:Case owl:Thing dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:LegalCase
rdfs:label
California Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Guerra
rdfs:comment
California Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Guerra, 479 U.S. 272 (1987), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court about whether a state may require employers to provide greater pregnancy benefits than required by federal law, as well as the ability to require pregnancy benefits to women without similar benefits to men. The court held that The California Fair Employment and Housing Act §12945(b)(2), which requires employers to provide leave and reinstatement to employees disabled by pregnancy, is consistent with federal law.
foaf:name
California Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Guerra, Director, Department of Fair Employment and Housing, et al.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Legal_issues_in_pregnancy dbc:History_of_women_in_California dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_reproductive_rights_case_law dbc:1987_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Parental_leave_in_the_United_States dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
dbo:wikiPageID
11463085
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1089208710
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Malone_v._White_Motor_Corp. dbr:Malone_v._White_Motor_Corp., dbr:California_Fair_Employment_and_Housing_Act dbr:9th_Cir. dbr:Pregnancy_discrimination dbr:US_labor_law dbr:Federal_government_of_the_United_States dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbc:Legal_issues_in_pregnancy dbc:United_States_reproductive_rights_case_law dbc:1987_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Rice_v._Santa_Fe_Elevator_Corp. dbr:Florida_Lime_&_Avocado_Growers,_Inc._v._Paul dbr:U.S._state dbc:History_of_women_in_California dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:Maternity_leave_in_the_United_States dbr:Shaw_v._Delta_Air_Lines,_Inc. dbc:Parental_leave_in_the_United_States dbr:Pregnancy_Discrimination_Act_of_1978 dbr:Pervel_Industries,_Inc._v._Connecticut_Comm'n_on_Human_Rights_and_Opportunities dbr:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 dbr:California_Federal_Bank dbr:Hines_v._Davidowitz dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:F.2d dbr:Jones_v._Rath_Packing_Co. dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Scalia_J dbr:Lillian_Garland
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n15:usrep479272.pdf n19:85-494 n16:272.html n5: n20: n17:3.html
owl:sameAs
n8:4efzn wikidata:Q5020487
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub dbt:Ussc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbp:dissent
White
dbp:joindissent
Rehnquist, Powell
dbp:joinmajority
Brennan, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor
dbp:lawsapplied
Cal. Gov't Code § 12945, Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978
dbp:oyez
n19:85-494
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
272
dbp:usvol
479
dbp:arguedate
0001-10-08
dbp:argueyear
1986
dbp:case
California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guerra,
dbp:decidedate
0001-01-13
dbp:decideyear
1987
dbp:findlaw
n16:272.html
dbp:fullname
California Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Guerra, Director, Department of Fair Employment and Housing, et al.
dbp:holding
§ 12945 is not preempted by Title VII, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, because it is not inconsistent with the purposes of Title VII, nor does it require the doing of an act that is unlawful under Title VII.
dbp:justia
n5:
dbp:litigants
California Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Guerra
dbp:majority
Marshall
dbp:otherSource
WorldLII
dbp:otherUrl
n17:3.html
dbp:loc
n15:usrep479272.pdf
dbo:abstract
California Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Guerra, 479 U.S. 272 (1987), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court about whether a state may require employers to provide greater pregnancy benefits than required by federal law, as well as the ability to require pregnancy benefits to women without similar benefits to men. The court held that The California Fair Employment and Housing Act §12945(b)(2), which requires employers to provide leave and reinstatement to employees disabled by pregnancy, is consistent with federal law.
dbp:concurrence
Stevens Scalia
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:California_Federal_Savings_and_Loan_Association_v._Guerra?oldid=1089208710&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
8136
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:California_Federal_Savings_and_Loan_Association_v._Guerra