. . . . . "1934"^^ . . . . . "290"^^ . . . "Burroughs v. United States, 290 U.S. 534 (1934), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld as constitutional the financial disclosure and reporting requirements of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act. The court also held that certain counts incorporated by description in other counts of an indictment may be considered in determining the adequacy of the original certain counts."@en . . . . "8907573"^^ . "Hughes, Van Devanter, Brandeis, Butler, Stone, Roberts, Cardozo"@en . "1095046330"^^ . . . . . . . . . "Burroughs v. United States,"@en . "1933"^^ . . "Sutherland"@en . . . . . . . . "7191"^^ . "Burroughs v. United States"@en . . "Burroughs and Cannon v. United States"@en . . "On appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia"@en . "Burroughs v. United States"@en . "Burroughs v. United States, 290 U.S. 534 (1934), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld as constitutional the financial disclosure and reporting requirements of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act. The court also held that certain counts incorporated by description in other counts of an indictment may be considered in determining the adequacy of the original certain counts."@en . . "--01-08"^^ . . . . . . . . "McReynolds"@en . . . . . "Federal Corrupt Practices Act, ; U.S. Const. art. II, \u00A7 1, cl. 2"@en . "54"^^ . . . . . . ""@en . . "Burroughs and Cannon v. United States"@en . "Incorporation by description may be considered in determining the adequacy of conspiracy and substantive counts; Federal Corrupt Practices Act of 1925 is not in violation of the Federal Constitution, Art. II. 1"@en . . . . "534"^^ . "--12-05"^^ . . . . . .